Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: HIV-associated cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasing in prevalence. The mechanisms underlying the heightened cardiovascular risk faced by people with HIV (PWH), however, remain poorly defined. Recent studies indicate an important role of lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) in predicting CVD risk in the general population, but little is known regarding its role in HIV-associated CVD. Thus, we sought to evaluate whether Lp(a) is elevated in PWH and if it is associated with impaired coronary endothelial function (CEF), a known mediator of CVD in PWH.
Methods And Results: In this cross-sectional study, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with isometric handgrip exercise, an endothelial dependent stressor, was performed to assess CEF in 65 PWH and 52 controls without HIV. Percent changes in coronary cross-sectional area and coronary blood flow from rest to stress were used to quantify CEF. Lp(a) levels were assessed by immunoturbidimetric assay at the time of magnetic resonance imaging. Lp(a) levels were higher in PWH compared with controls (78 nmol/L [39-137 nmol/L] versus 45.5 nmol/L [18-102.5 nmol/L], <0.01). Both percent change in coronary cross-sectional area (0.38% [-6.1% to 5.4%] versus 7.43% [2.4%-11.2%], <0.0005) and coronary blood flow (9.1% [-1.3% to 23.1%] versus 24.1% [3.3%-39.8%], <0.05) were lower in PWH compared with controls. In PWH, Lp(a) was inversely associated with percent change in coronary cross-sectional area (β=-6.18±1.01%/nmol/L, <0.001) but not with percent change in coronary blood flow even after adjustment for confounding risk factors. No association between Lp(a) and measures of CEF was observed in individuals without HIV.
Conclusions: Lp(a) concentrations are elevated in PWH and inversely related to CEF in PWH.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.035975 | DOI Listing |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11681595 | PMC |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!