A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Quality of life and utility of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD): a systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • * This study systematically reviewed literature and pooled utility estimates from 14 high-quality studies involving 3,664 PAD patients, using established classification systems like Rutherford and Fontaine.
  • * The findings indicated a pooled utility score of 0.67 for Rutherford categories and 0.68 for Fontaine stages, suggesting that PAD has a similar health utility to other chronic diseases and can inform cost-utility analyses in PAD management.

Article Abstract

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients experience low utility, especially those having undergone amputation. Utility is one of the quality weights of health status, converted from quality of life (QOL). This study aimed to systematically review published literature and analyze a pooled estimate of utility in PAD patients. The following databases were queried for articles published from inception up to August 30, 2022: PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, ThaiJo, and the Thai thesis database. Four quality assessment tools were used, tailored to each study's design. A pooled utility was estimated by the random effect and reported using Rutherford and Fontaine classification systems due to their common use in practice. The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023392775). Fourteen high-quality studies were included, pooling utility from 3,664 PAD patients. The pooled utility by the Rutherford categories was 0.67, with scores for categories 0, 1-3, 4, and 5 being 0.88, 0.65, 0.68, and 0.58, respectively. The pooled utility by the Fontaine stage was 0.68, with stages 1, 2, 3, and 4 scoring 0.88, 0.65, 0.67, and 0.58, respectively. PAD utility is comparable to that of other chronic diseases. The pooled utility could be a valuable parameter for cost-utility analysis in PAD management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582567PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80387-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pooled utility
16
pad patients
12
utility
10
quality life
8
peripheral artery
8
artery disease
8
disease pad
8
088 065
8
pad
6
pooled
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!