AI Article Synopsis

  • Lower eGFR might lead to reluctance in starting heart failure therapies, and the study examines how kidney function influences the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan.
  • The PARAGON-HF trial included 4,796 chronic heart failure patients and found that those with lower baseline eGFR (<45 mL/min/1.73 m²) experienced a greater reduction in cardiovascular events when treated with sacubitril/valsartan.
  • The results suggest that sacubitril/valsartan is particularly beneficial for heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction and lower eGFR, indicating the need for careful consideration when prescribing treatments in this population.

Article Abstract

Background: Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) may be one of the major reasons for hesitation or failure to initiate potentially beneficial therapies in patients with heart failure (HF).

Objectives: This study sought to assess if the effects of sacubitril/valsartan (vs valsartan) on cardiovascular outcomes differ according to baseline kidney function in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.

Methods: The PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ARB Global Outcomes in HF with Preserved Ejection Fraction) trial was global clinical trial of 4,796 patients with chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥45% randomly assigned to sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan. We examined the effect of treatment on cardiovascular outcomes using Cox regression models, stratified by region, and assessed for differential treatment effects according to the baseline eGFR and ejection fraction.

Results: At randomization, mean eGFR was 67 ± 19 mL/min/1.73 m; 1,955 (41%) participants had an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m. Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the primary cardiovascular outcome (cardiovascular death and total HF hospitalizations) to a greater extent among those with lower baseline eGFR (P interaction = 0.07 for continuous eGFR), and was most pronounced for those with eGFR ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.51-0.94). The influence of eGFR on the treatment effect for cardiovascular death was nonlinear, with the most pronounced treatment effect for those with baseline eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.97). In further subgroup analyses according to LVEF and eGFR, the treatment effect for the primary outcome was most pronounced among those with LVEF ≤57% and eGFR ≤45 mL/min/1.73 m (HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.45-0.97).

Conclusions: In the PARAGON-HF trial, the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan to reduce the frequency of HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death were most apparent in patients with lower baseline eGFR and lower ejection fraction. (Efficacy and Safety of LCZ696 Compared to Valsartan, on Morbidity and Mortality in Heart Failure Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction [PARAGON-HF]; NCT01920711).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2024.08.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cardiovascular outcomes
12
kidney function
8
sacubitril/valsartan valsartan
8
preserved ejection
8
ejection fraction
8
angiotensin receptor
4
receptor neprilysin
4
neprilysin inhibition
4
inhibition cardiovascular
4
outcomes
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!