Updating the Quality Family Planning recommendations is an essential step toward offering all people evidenced-informed, person-centered, equitable, and inclusive sexual and reproductive health care. What constitutes quality sexual and reproductive health care constantly evolves as scientific research generates new evidence. In addition, the context in which people seek and receive sexual and reproductive health care has changed significantly in recent years. Today's sexual and reproductive health context is also complex and evolving against the backdrop of an increasing awareness of the impact of structural and interpersonal racism, classism, discrimination (or bias) based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity, and ableism on health and sexual and reproductive health care. The Office of Population Affairs of the HHS sought to be responsive to these complex conditions by centering equity in the update of its Quality Family Planning recommendations from start to finish, including in its approach to reviews of published literature, the creation of expert and technical workgroups to assess the literature and make recommendations, and actively engaging persons with lived experience to gather their insights so that the final product could genuinely respond to the needs of the community.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.023 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Provider views on vasectomy: cultural, gender, and political elements of Men's decisions to seek publicly funded services.
Front Reprod Health
December 2024
Collaborative Center to Advance Health Services, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kanas City, MO, United States.
Introduction: Evidence suggests a new demand for vasectomies following the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization [597 U.S.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSexual Health in Women and Sexual-Gender-Minority Patients with Cancer: A Nationwide Survey on Healthcare Professional Awareness and Attitude on behalf of MITO and AIRO-Gynecology Group.
J Cancer Policy
December 2024
Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Gynecological Endocrinology and Menopause, Foundation IRCCS Polyclinic San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Background: Compared to male patients, sexual health remains poorly studied in women and sexual gender minority (SGM) patients with cancers.
Material And Methods: An online survey was developed by a multidisciplinary team to assess the awareness and attitude of Italian oncological providers facing sexual health during or after cancer treatment. On behalf of the respective scientific committees, the questionnaire was sent to Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies group (MITO) and to Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) Group.
Assessment of reproductive knowledge among young adults utilizing Amazon mechanical Turk survey.
Ther Adv Reprod Health
December 2024
Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1150 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Background: Reproductive health technology has evolved significantly since the introduction of in vitro fertilization in 1978, enhancing the possibility of conceiving children at later stages in life. Despite these advancements, there remains a critical gap in fertility knowledge among young adults, as demonstrated by recent studies. This gap is compounded by the growing influence of social media on health information, where misinformation can distort public understanding of fertility-related issues.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFrom Choice to Justice: Disrupting the Binary Political Logics of Assisted Reproduction.
Health Hum Rights
December 2024
Associate professor of women, gender, and sexuality studies in the Frederik Meijer Honors College at Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan, United States.
Reproductive rights and reproductive justice paradigms have long been viewed as incompatible, largely because of their divergent orientations to the notion of choice. According to this oppositional framing, reproductive rights approaches have centered the right of (white, middle-class, heterosexual) women to choose not to have children while reproductive justice organizing has focused on gendered, racialized, and classed obstacles to control over whether and how to have and raise children. Amid increasing examination of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) vis-à-vis human rights principles, I see an opportunity to narrow the perceived gap between the politics of rights and justice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Digital Transformation and the Right to Health of Young Adults in Bangladesh and Colombia: A Community-Engaged Study.
Health Hum Rights
December 2024
In her 2023 report to the United Nations Human Rights Council on digital innovation, technology, and the right to health, the Special Rapporteur on the right to health underscored the positive impact of the digital transformation on young people, but also noted serious concerns, calling for greater efforts to consult and engage with youth and civil society. In our study, early-career researchers from Bangladesh and Colombia collaborated within a broader international research and advocacy project to investigate how diverse young adults experience digital health and to invite their recommendations and collaborative advocacy. Researchers held focus group discussions and interviews with young adults aged 18-30 (in Bangladesh, predominantly men; in Colombia, people living with HIV, gay men, and transgender women).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!