AI Article Synopsis
- The research explores how cancer-related conspiracy beliefs and misinformation affect treatment decisions in a cancer-free population, using three pre-registered studies with a total of 1020 participants.
- Study 1 was unsuccessful in manipulating conspiracy beliefs, while Study 2 found that exposure to pro-conspiracy content led to increased conspiracy beliefs, decreased intentions to use chemotherapy, and a greater inclination toward unconventional treatments.
- Study 3 confirmed the findings and showed that providing a warning about misinformation significantly reduced its credibility and helped mitigate negative impacts on treatment intentions.
Article Abstract
Cancer is an important issue and a model topic for misinformatfion researchers. The present research experimentally investigates the effect of cancer-related conspiracy beliefs and misinformation on oncology treatment intentions in a cancer-free population. In three pre-registered studies (N total = 1020), participants were asked to put themselves in the shoes of a patient recommended for chemotherapy. Study 1 (N = 300) failed to experimentally manipulate cancer-related conspiracy beliefs with exposure to a health scandal not related to cancer. In Study 2 (N = 258), exposure to a pro-conspiracy (vs. anti-conspiracy) content related to cancer treatment was associated with more conspiracy beliefs, less intention to use chemotherapy and more intentions to use unconventional medicines. Exploratory analyses revealed that these effects were conditioned by the credibility of the misinformation. Study 3 (N = 462) replicated these findings using a full experimental design. Exposure (vs. no exposure) to a warning and accuracy prompt, prior to exposure to the pro-conspiracy content, was found to be effective in reducing its credibility and preventing its detrimental effects. These findings corroborate the existence of an effect of conspiracy beliefs on treatment intentions in oncology and also suggest several ways to mitigate them.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11652127 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12615 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Quality information and fake news on Covid-19 and immunization among adolescents: a qualitative analysis in school settings.
Ann Ig
January 2025
Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Salento, Lecce, Complesso Ecotekne, Lecce, Italy.
Background: Correct information is an essential tool to guide thoughts, attitudes, daily choices or more important decisions such as those regarding health. Today, a huge amount of information sources and media is available. Increasing possibilities of obtaining data also require understanding and positioning skills, particularly the ability to navigate the ocean of information and to choose what is best without becoming overwhelmed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF[Building trust together].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd
January 2025
Groepspraktijk Huisartsen Bergh, 's-Heerenberg.
Since the corona pandemic, there has been more distrust towards the government and official institutions, more people are attracted to conspiracy theories and society has become more polarized. This increased distrust is also reflected in doctors' consulting rooms. It can be specifically aimed at medical interventions, the prescription of medication and the use of vaccinations, but also more broadly at the doctor as a representative of the established order.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPandemic or "Plandemic"?: The Mediating Role of Epistemic Justification Strategies in the Relationship Between COVID-19 Conspiracy Beliefs and COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs.
Brain Behav
January 2025
Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Background: In today's post-truth times, where personal feelings and beliefs have become increasingly important, determining what is accurate knowledge has become an important skill. This is especially important during uncertainty crises (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCorrelates of COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in Japan: A cross-sectional study of 28,175 residents.
PLoS One
January 2025
Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increase in conspiracy theories worldwide. However, in Japan, the prevalence of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs has remained unclear. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs using a survey of 28,175 residents of Japan aged 16-81 years old.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPeople with autistic traits are more likely to engage with misinformation and conspiracy theories in a simulated social media context.
Cogn Neuropsychiatry
January 2025
College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Background: People with higher levels of autistic traits are shown to be more likely to endorse conspiracy theories and misinformation on traditional methods of measurement (e.g., self-report).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!