Can anatomy-based fitting improve musical perception in adult cochlear implant users?

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol

Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

Published: November 2024

Objectives: To compare Anatomy-Based Fitting (ABF) vs. Default Fitting (DF) in terms of music perception and music enjoyment in CI users.

Methods: CI users ≥ 18 years implanted with a Synchrony ST Flex28 (MEDEL) with at least 12 months of experience with either ABF or DF, with good speech tests outcomes (≥ 65% disyllables) were enrolled. Music tasks were assessed with "Discovery" level of Meludia online interactive music tool, which includes Rhythm (beat count), Spatialization (differentiating between lower and higher notes), Stable/unstable (perception of stability or instability), Melody (ascendant or descendant), and Density (presence of one or multiple simultaneous sounds). Each task consists of five levels of difficulty. Participants were allowed a maximum of 4 attempts to complete a level. The Music-Related Quality of Life (MuRQoL) and the Munich Music (MUMU) questionnaires evaluated music background.

Results: Twenty CI users took part: 10 using ABF and 10 DF. There were no significant differences in age at implantation (53.2 ± 15.0 vs. 53.8 ± 14.5y), time since surgery (1.8 ± 0.5 vs. 2.4 ± 1.5y), or the percentage of disyllables in silence (68.0 ± 8.0 vs. 77.3 ± 11.5%) between groups. Regarding Meludia scores, differences were observed between both groups in Density: ABF had better mean scores when completing the level in only one attempt (8.7 ± 2.5 vs. 4.6 ± 3.1, p = 0.016) and required fewer restarts to complete the five levels (6.6 ± 1.6 vs. 9.3 ± 2.3; p = 0.009). Furthermore, the fifth level of Density was successfully completed by 60% of patients with ABF, while none of the patients with DF achieved this (p = 0.003). The scores obtained in MuRQoL were similar between ABF and DF groups. In a similar way, the MUMU showed no differences in terms of frequency and music importance.

Conclusions: ABF demonstrates specific advantages in certain musical tasks, specifically in processing multiple sounds simultaneously. Further studies are necessary to explore additional benefits of ABF in musical skills in CI users. NCT05319678.

Level Of Evidence: Level 3.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617376PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101533DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anatomy-based fitting
8
abf
8
music
7
level
5
fitting improve
4
improve musical
4
musical perception
4
perception adult
4
adult cochlear
4
cochlear implant
4

Similar Publications

Can anatomy-based fitting improve musical perception in adult cochlear implant users?

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol

November 2024

Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ Research Institute, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Madrid, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain.

Objectives: To compare Anatomy-Based Fitting (ABF) vs. Default Fitting (DF) in terms of music perception and music enjoyment in CI users.

Methods: CI users ≥ 18 years implanted with a Synchrony ST Flex28 (MEDEL) with at least 12 months of experience with either ABF or DF, with good speech tests outcomes (≥ 65% disyllables) were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

X-ray guided anatomy-based fitting: The validity of OTOPLAN.

PLoS One

November 2024

King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), King Saud Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Background: Anatomy-based fitting (ABF) for cochlear implant users is a new era that seeks improved outcomes. Recently, different imaging modalities, such as plain X-rays, have been proposed to build the ABF as an alternative to the computed tomography (CT) scan. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of OTOPLAN® software in building ABF using plain X-ray imaging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Anatomy-based fitting (ABF), a relatively new technique for cochlear implant (CI) programming, attempts to lessen the impact of the electrode insertion location-related frequency-to-place mismatch (FPM). This study aimed to compare vowels and consonant perception in quiet and in noise among experienced adult CI users using the ABF and the regular, conventional-based fitting (CBF) map (pre-ABF) over 6 months.

Methods: Nine ears from eight experienced adult CI users were included in the experimental and longitudinal research.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Anatomy-based fitting improves speech perception in noise for cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness.

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

September 2024

Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.

Objective: To evaluate objective and subjective hearing outcomes in experienced cochlear implant users with single sided deafness (SSD CI) who used fitting maps created via anatomy-based fitting (ABF) and clinically-based fitting (CBF).

Participants: Twelve SSD CI users with postlingual hearing loss.

Intervention: OTOPLAN (Version 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: The aim is to investigate the influence of the anatomy-based fitting (ABF) in cochlear implants (CI) on the perception of specific musical features.

Design: The Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia (MBEA) test battery was performed with a collective of 16 CI users with and without an anatomy-based fitting and 9 normal hearing subjects. The insertion angles of the intracochlear electrode arrays were calculated using Otoplan® (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria) software.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!