A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Prevalence of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Infertile Patients: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. | LitMetric

There is a significant increase in the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by infertile patients. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of CAM use by infertile patients. This review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The required data were obtained by searching English databases (PubMed and Web of Science) as well as Google Scholar as an additional source of records. We included cross-sectional studies published in English journals up to March 2023 that examined the prevalence of CAM use among infertile patients in different countries. The retrieved articles were independently assessed by two reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion with the intent to reach a consensus. We reviewed 1192 documents. From these, 29 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis conducted on 32, 804 infertile patients showed a prevalence rate of CAM use between 26.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 21.7%-31.3%] and 96.1% (95% CI: 95.7%-96.5%) in various countries. The pooled prevalence rate calculated by the random effects model showed that, overall, 54% (95% CI: 46%-61%) of both infertile women and men used CAM, whereas 55% (95% CI: 47%-67%) of infertile women and 29% (95% CI: 17%-41%) of infertile men reported treatment with CAM. More than half of the infertile patients used CAM. Therefore, healthcare practitioners need to be aware of this practice to better provide care for infertile patients. Further studies should examine the reasons for CAM use by infertile patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11589981PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2024.2005352.1482DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infertile patients
32
cam infertile
16
infertile
11
complementary alternative
8
alternative medicine
8
patients
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
cam
8
prevalence cam
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!