Background: Management of opioid dependence requires titrating medication doses based on withdrawal symptoms, but its clinical assessment presents challenges when it comes to subjective reporting. This study aimed to find out the relationship between heart rate variability (HRV) and opioid withdrawal in patients with opioid dependence.

Methods: Three groups of adult males were recruited: (a) patients with opioid dependence undergoing inpatient detoxification, (b) patients with opioid dependence stabilized on buprenorphine-based opioid substitution treatment, and (c) healthy controls. Frequency and time-domain parameters of HRV were used in the analysis. The opioid withdrawal was assessed using the Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS).

Results: Resting heart rate was found to be significantly different across the three groups (higher in patients stabilized on buprenorphine than the other two groups). In time-domain parameters, the detoxification group had the highest beat-to-beat variability. In frequency-domain parameters, the total power was highest for the detoxification group and lowest for the opioid substitution treatment group. In contrast, the relative power of frequency bands (very low, low, and high) did not vary across the groups at baseline. The SOWS had a weak negative correlation with root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) in the opioid substitution group and did not have any relationship with HRV parameters in the detoxification group.

Conclusions: This exploratory study did not find HRV parameters to be robustly associated with subjective withdrawal, except for a negative association with the beat-to-beat variability among patients on opioid substitution treatment. This study adds to information on HRV in patients with opioid dependence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572500PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02537176241292590DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients opioid
24
opioid dependence
20
opioid substitution
16
heart rate
12
opioid
12
substitution treatment
12
rate variability
8
exploratory study
8
opioid withdrawal
8
three groups
8

Similar Publications

Background: Modified thoracoabdominal nerves block through perichondrial approach (M-TAPA) is a trunk block that has been gaining attention for managing postoperative pain following abdominal surgeries since its first report in 2019. We conducted a scoping review on M-TAPA, aiming to comprehensively evaluate existing research, identify the gaps in knowledge, and understand the implications of M-TAPA.

Methods: This scoping review was conducted using databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL to evaluate the clinical efficacy of M-TAPA on April 19, 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

COVID-19 can increase the long-term risk of multiorgan dysfunction. Few studies investigated the long-term risk in Asian populations or investigated the association between viral load and long-term risk. We aimed to investigate the post-discharge rates of hospitalization and association with baseline viral load in all patients with COVID-19 in Hong Kong.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Tramadol as a fentanyl adulterant: Prevalence and management in a ToxIC Fentalog study prospective cohort.

Am J Emerg Med

December 2024

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Center for Research on Emerging Substances, Poisoning, Overdose, and New Discoveries (RESPOND), NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst, New York, NY, USA.

Background: Tramadol is an adulterant of illicit opioids. As it is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor as well as a μ-opioid agonist, tramadol adulteration may worsen overdose signs and symptoms or affect the amount of naloxone patients receive.

Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective cohort of adult patients with suspected opioid overdoses who presented to one of eight United States emergency departments and were included in the Toxicology Investigators Consortium's Fentalog Study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Utility values of responders and nonresponders are essential inputs in cost-effectiveness studies of radiation therapy for painful bone metastases but, to our knowledge, they have not been reported separately. We sought to determine the utility values of responders and nonresponders using data from a prospective observational study on bone metastases. The original prospective observational study was conducted at 26 centers in Japan.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!