AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study examines how diastolic dysfunction (a type of heart issue) affects long-term cancer survivors, noting that current evaluations tend to overlook this aspect compared to systolic function (another heart function type).
  • - Data from the ARIC Study was analyzed, including echocardiographic assessments and cancer histories, and revealed similar rates of diastolic dysfunction in cancer survivors (12.26%) compared to non-cancer participants (10.73%).
  • - Results indicated a significant correlation between diastolic dysfunction and increased risks of heart failure and death in cancer survivors, with hazard ratios showing that those with pronounced dysfunction face much higher hazards for these outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: Cancer survivors face elevated risks of heart failure (HF) and death, with cardiac dysfunction being a significant concern. Current evaluations often emphasize systolic function while insufficiently addressing diastolic function. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction and assess its prognostic implications in long-term cancer survivors.

Methods: We analyzed participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study with complete echocardiographic assessments and documented cancer histories. Diastolic function was classified by guideline criteria: normal (≤ 1 abnormal parameter), indeterminate (2 abnormal parameters), and dysfunction (≥ 3 abnormal parameters). The primary outcomes were incident HF and all-cause death. Diastolic dysfunction prevalence was compared between cancer survivors and non-cancer participants after propensity score matching. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were used to assess associated risks.

Results: A total of 5322 participants were included, with 18.4% (N = 979) being cancer survivors. The mean age of cancer survivors at echocardiography was 76.3 (5.10) years, with a median of 12.17 years since diagnosis. There were no significant differences in diastolic dysfunction prevalence (12.26% vs 10.73%, P = 0.29) after matching. Cox regression revealed a graded association between diastolic dysfunction and risks of HF and death. Fully adjusted hazard ratios were 2.59 (95% CI: 1.59-4.20, P < 0.001) for indeterminate diastolic function and 4.41 (95% CI: 2.40-8.12, P < 0.001) for diastolic dysfunction in HF; and 1.68 (95% CI: 1.26-2.25, P < 0.001) for indeterminate and 2.21 (95% CI: 1.51-3.22, P < 0.001) for diastolic dysfunction in all-cause death. These results were consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses and supported by Kaplan-Meier curves. RCS analyses demonstrated dose-response relationships between individual diastolic parameters and outcomes.

Conclusions: Diastolic dysfunction is prevalent among long-term cancer survivors and is stepwise associated with adverse outcomes. These findings underscore the essential need for ongoing monitoring of diastolic function in this population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575149PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03773-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diastolic dysfunction
20
cancer survivors
20
dysfunction risks
8
risks heart
8
heart failure
8
failure death
8
diastolic function
8
abnormal parameters
8
dysfunction prevalence
8
matching cox
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!