Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the efficacy and risk factors of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer patients.
Methods: One hundred lung cancer patients who were treated in our hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were selected as the study subjects and divided into chemotherapy group (n = 50) and ICIs group (n = 50), in which the chemotherapy group was given the combined treatment of vincristine and cisplatin (NP), while the ICIs group was given ICIs for treatment. The therapeutic effect and adverse reactions (hypertriglyceridemia, anemia, hypertension and hypoproteinemia) of the two groups were compared, and fasting venous blood was collected. The levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 199 (CA199) were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. According to the therapeutic effect, 100 patients with lung cancer were divided into complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) group (n = 52) and stable (SD) + progressive (PD) group (n = 48). The clinical data and pathologic data of the two groups were compared.
Results: The rates of objective effective rate (ORR) in chemotherapy group and ICIs group were 36.00% and 68.00% respectively, and the level of ORR in ICIs group was significantly higher than that in chemotherapy group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in serum CEA and CA199 levels between the two groups before operation (P > 0.05). Three months after operation, the serum CEA and CA199 levels in ICIs group were significantly lower than those in chemotherapy group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The adverse reactions of hypertriglyceridemia, anemia, hypertension and hypoproteinemia in chemotherapy group and ICIs group during treatment were all grade 1-2, and the incidence of adverse reactions was similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in sex, age, anatomic position, pathologic type, smoking history and differentiation between the two groups (P > 0.05). In SD + PD group, the preoperative maximum tumor diameter > 4 cm, tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage IV, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥ 183 U/L, and tumor volume ≥ 120m were significantly higher than those in CR + PR group, and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 41.8 and the proportion of ICIs were significantly lower than those in CR + PR group, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative maximum tumor diameter > 4 cm and LDH ≥ 183 U/L were risk factors for poor lung cancer outcome, and PNI ≥ 41.8 and ICIs treatment were protective factors for poor lung cancer outcome (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: ICIs is effective in the treatment of lung cancer, which can obviously reduce the tumor load and has high safety. In addition, the maximum tumor diameter and LDH are risk factors that affect the poor curative effect of lung cancer. High PNI level and ICIs treatment are helpful to improve the effect of lung cancer, and early monitoring is helpful to guide the treatment plan and evaluate the treatment effect.
