Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Importance: Medicaid expansion broadened access to care; however, limited data about the effect on access to anti-incontinence surgical procedures exist.
Objective: Since the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansion in 2014, some regions have had more states adopt expansion (NE-Northeast, W-West) than other regions (S-South, MW-Midwest). We aimed to determine if the proportion of Medicaid funded anti-incontinence procedures increased after Medicaid expansion and whether increases were different by U.S. region.
Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study.
Results: The 2012-2018 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample was reviewed for anti-incontinence surgical procedures. Medicaid supported surgical procedures were compared by region and year, and among marginalized populations. During the study period 66,510 surgical procedures were performed. Medicaid as a primary payer for anti-incontinence procedures increased from 10% to 12% (P = <0.001) between 2012 and 2018. The percentage of Medicaid supported procedures performed in the NE (13%) and W (17%) were greater than MW (9%) and S (8%). Procedures among Black, Hispanic or lowest income quartile patients were lowest in the S and did not increase after expansion during the study period (2012 vs 2018, all P = NS). When controlling for confounders, the MW (odds ratio [OR] 0.58; 95% CI 0.46-0.74) and S (OR 0.33; 95% CI 0.26-0.42) were less likely to have Medicaid covered surgical procedures compared to the NE and W (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.84-1.29).
Conclusions: Nationally, the percentage of Medicaid-supported anti-incontinence procedures increased after expansion. Northeast and W access to procedures increased, and access by marginalized populations broadened, while the S and MW had the most limited proportion of anti-incontinence surgical procedures covered by Medicaid.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001592 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!