It all began in Issaquah 50 years ago.

"Somehow scientists still pursue the same questions, if now on higher levels of theoretical abstraction rooted in deeper layers of empirical evidence… To paraphrase an old philosophy joke, science is more like it is today than it has ever been. In other words, science remains as challenging as ever to human inquiry. And the need to communicate its progress… remains as essential now as then." - Tom Siegfried, Science News 2021In fact, essential questions about pain have not changed since IASP's creation in Issaquah: what causes it and how can we treat it? Are we any closer to answering these questions, or have we just widened the gap between bench and bedside? The technology used to answer questions about pain mechanisms has certainly changed, whether the focus is on sensory neurons, spinal cord circuitry, descending controls or cortical pain processing. In this paper, we will describe how transgenics, transcriptomics, optogenetics, calcium imaging, fMRI, neuroimmunology and in silico drug development have transformed the way we examine the complexity of pain processing. But does it all, as our founders hoped, help people with pain? Are voltage-gated Na channels the new holy grail for analgesic development, is there a pain biomarker, can we completely replace opioids, will proteomic analyses identify novel targets, is there a "pain matrix," and can it be targeted? Do the answers lie in our tangible discoveries, or in the seemingly intangible? Our founders could barely imagine what we know now, yet their questions remain.