Informing Alzheimer's Biomarker Communication: Concerns and Understanding of Cognitively Unimpaired Adults During Amyloid Results Disclosure.

J Prev Alzheimers Dis

Fred B. Ketchum, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USA, Phone (608) 265-5523, Fax (608) 263-0412,

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Participants in the study, predominantly older adults, demonstrated a high level of understanding regarding their amyloid PET scan results, regardless of whether the results were elevated or non-elevated.
  • Those with elevated results expressed a stronger desire to modify their lifestyle and had more questions compared to those with non-elevated results, highlighting a difference in concern based on result interpretation.
  • The study emphasizes the need for clinicians to address participants' concerns during the disclosure process, ensuring that both understanding and emotional responses are adequately supported.

Article Abstract

Background: Biomarker results are increasingly disclosed in research and clinical settings, but less is known about how individuals interpret their results or concerns raised during the disclosure visit that may need to be addressed by clinicians to ensure appropriate disclosure.

Methods: Fifty-two cognitively unimpaired older adults aged 65 to 89 years old from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention, who had undergone an amyloid PET scan in the previous 18 months, were enrolled in the disclosure substudy. After ensuring psychological readiness, trained study clinicians disclosed amyloid PET results using a structured protocol. We assessed participants' level of understanding, concerns, and the perceived personal significance of their biomarker results during the disclosure visit through a series of question prompts in real-time.

Results: Thirty-four received a non-elevated amyloid result and 18 received an elevated result. The average age was 72.2 years (range 65-81); most were women (64%) and non-Hispanic White (92%). Participants understood their results (98%), and both non-elevated and elevated groups provided similar responses around topics of sharing with others, privacy, accuracy of testing, and risk. Participants with elevated results were significantly more likely than those with non-elevated results to want to change their lifestyle (78% vs 12%, p=<0.01) and have questions about their results (61% vs 30%, p=0.05). Participants interpreted the personal significance of results in terms of several themes relating to individual risk status, emotional impact, whether the result was expected, and prevention/planning.

Conclusion: Results show that participants understand their biomarker results, and have a number of concerns during the disclosure process that clinical and research protocols could address. en These findings could be important considerations as effective processes are developed for widespread biomarker disclosure in clinical and research settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11573811PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2024.151DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cognitively unimpaired
8
disclosure visit
8
amyloid pet
8
informing alzheimer's
4
alzheimer's biomarker
4
biomarker communication
4
communication concerns
4
concerns understanding
4
understanding cognitively
4
unimpaired adults
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!