A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Bond behavior of confined rebar in recycled brick aggregate concrete using bending pullout test. | LitMetric

The pertinence of recycled brick aggregate (RBA) in concrete structures largely depends on their bonding ability with the rebars. Considering the practical detailing of concrete structures where main rebars are usually confined by stirrups, this study conducted bending pullout tests on 12 beam specimens to study the influence of concrete confinement on the bond behavior of rebar in RBA concrete. The investigated variables include RBA%, rebar diameter (), embedment length ( ), and the ratio of concrete cover to rebar diameter (). Bond stress-slip relationships were acquired, analyzed, and average bond strengths were compared to the AS 3600, CEB-FIP codes, and existing MacGregor's model. The average bond strength of confined specimens was nearly double that of the unconfined specimens. A progressive increase in bond strength was noticed with the presence of RBA regardless of confinement. The confined specimens also exhibited higher deformability, ductility, and toughness values than those of the unconfined beams. At 15% RBA content, the maximum toughness value of the confined specimen was 3078.1 J, while the unconfined specimens reached a value of 278.1 J, only. Similarly, the ductility of the confined beam was found in a range of 1.21-1.60 whereas the value is only 1.04-1.10 for the unconfined cases. Moreover, the confined specimens exhibited a significant number of cracks during their failure, while the unconfined specimens experienced a split type brittle failure. Nevertheless, these findings may contribute to the further development of the bond behavior of rebar in RBA-based concrete structures and thus play a role in the sustainability of construction materials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11570301PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39925DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bond behavior
12
concrete structures
12
confined specimens
12
unconfined specimens
12
recycled brick
8
brick aggregate
8
bending pullout
8
rba concrete
8
behavior rebar
8
rebar diameter
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!