Marginal Mandibulectomy in Oral Cavity SCC: Experience in a Tertiary Care Centre.

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Department of Surgical Oncology, Madras Medical College, Rajiv Gandhi Govt. General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.

Published: December 2024

Marginal mandibulectomy is indicated for oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas that involve floor of mouth, abut or minimally erode the mandible without gross invasion. Successful outcomes after Marginal mandibulectomy is predicated on accurate patient selection and appropriate adjuvant treatment based on specific host and tumor characteristics. To study the onclogical outcomes in terms of loco-regional recurrence free survival and disease specific survival of marginal mandibulectomy done for oral squamous cell carcinomas. Study Design-Retrospective study. Setting-The study was done from January 2018 to January 2021 at our tertiary care centre Madras Medical College, Chennai. Subjects-30 cases were included in our study who underwent Marginal Mandibulectomy for oral cavity SCC. Methods-The decision to perform a marginal mandibulectomy was taken based on preoperative clinical examination, contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) findings and intra-operative assessment under anesthesia. Disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and local control rates were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method. Oncologic outcomes in terms of Overall survival and Disease-specific survival at the end of 1 year and 3 years for the gingival, buccal, tongue, floor of mouth cancers were analyzed. Independent impacts including the site of tumor, T and N stage, microscopic bony invasion, grade of differentiation, adjuvant radiotherapy on the loco-regional control and cause-specific survival were evaluated using Kaplan meier method. Our study group was comprised of 20(66.67%) males and 10 (33.33%) females of mean age 54 years. None of them had prior radiotherapy to the head and neck region. A total of 7 (23.33%) marginal mandibulectomies were carried out for SCC in the gingival region, 11(36.67%) for buccal mucosa, 8(26.67%) for tongue, 2(6.67%) for floor of mouth SCC, 1(3.33%) involving lip, 1(3.33%) in Retromolar trigone. Clinically 2 (6.67%) patients had T1 cancer, 18 (54.54%) had T2, 6 (18.18%) had T3, 4(13.33%) had T4 tumor. Clinically Neck nodes were not palpable in 17 (56.67%) patients, 10 (33.33%) had N1 disease and 3 (10%) had N2 disease. T and N stage distributions for tongue/floor of mouth and gingival buccal complex cancers are summarized in the table and there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. 19 (63.33%) had selective neck dissection (levels I-III), and 11 (36.67%) had comprehensive neck dissection. Well-differentiated tumors were encountered in 12 (40%) cases, moderately differentiated tumors in 16 (53.33%) cases, and poorly differentiated tumors in 2 (6.67%) cases. Bone was microscopically involved in 4 (13.33%) cases and mucosal margin of excision was less than 5 mm from the tumor in 2 (6.67%) cases. Cumulative hazard of local recurrence was not significantly affected by mandibular involvement. On histopathologic examination, positive nodes were seen in 6(20%) cases that included 3 (10%) with pN1 and the rest with pN2 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy (56 to 64 Gy) was given to 13 (43.33%) patients. In carefully selected patients, marginal mandibulectomy in oral squamous cancer achieves good oncological outcome in terms of locoregional control and overall survival rates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569282PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12070-024-05070-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

marginal mandibulectomy
28
mandibulectomy oral
16
oral cavity
12
floor mouth
12
marginal
8
cavity scc
8
tertiary care
8
care centre
8
squamous cell
8
cell carcinomas
8

Similar Publications

Background: Many studies have compared lip-splitting mandibulotomy (LSM) and lip-mandible preservation (LMP) techniques in oral and oropharyngeal cancer (OOPC) patients with inconsistent conclusions. Evidence-based recommendations for the optimal surgical approach for treating OOPC are lacking.

Methods: The Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, WAN-FANG, CQVIP, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were systematically searched to identify studies that compared LSM versus LMP for OOPC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Utilization of magnetic mallet during dental implantation in narrow mandibular alveolar ridge: A case report.

Int J Surg Case Rep

November 2024

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.

Introduction And Importance: Placing dental implants in a narrow mandibular alveolar ridge poses a range of significant challenges. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the combined application of piezoelectric surgery and magnetic mallet for alveolar ridge splitting and bone expansion in dental implant procedures. It aims to highlight the potential benefits of integrating these technologies in mandibular implant sites.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Marginal Mandibulectomy in Oral Cavity SCC: Experience in a Tertiary Care Centre.

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

December 2024

Department of Surgical Oncology, Madras Medical College, Rajiv Gandhi Govt. General Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu India.

Marginal mandibulectomy is indicated for oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas that involve floor of mouth, abut or minimally erode the mandible without gross invasion. Successful outcomes after Marginal mandibulectomy is predicated on accurate patient selection and appropriate adjuvant treatment based on specific host and tumor characteristics. To study the onclogical outcomes in terms of loco-regional recurrence free survival and disease specific survival of marginal mandibulectomy done for oral squamous cell carcinomas.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Segmental resections of the mandible may cause severe functional and aesthetic problems due to continuity loss. The morbidity after mandibular resection can be minimized after microvascular transfer of vascularized bone grafts. Although free flaps have become the gold standard in the past decades for reconstruction of oral cavity defects, regional flaps can also be a reliable option in certain cases, especially for those belonging to the lower socioeconomic corridor and or with coexisting chronic comorbidities which will not allow lengthier procedures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The pathological evaluation of cancellous bone at resection margins of mandibular osteoradionecrosis (ORN) has not been well elucidated. Here, we developed a unique classification system for evaluating the degree of bone marrow fibrosis, one of most common pathological features, in patients with mandibular ORN, based on which we investigated its relationship with treatment outcome.

Methods: This study included 15 patients who underwent mandibulectomy and free fibula osteocutaneous flap reconstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!