[Left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic cardiac resynchronisation therapy : Pros and cons].

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol

Klinik für Kardiologie, Elektrophysiologie und Angiologie, Klinikum Lüdenscheid, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland.

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves quality of life and life expectancy for many heart failure patients, making it a widely used treatment in Germany.
  • His bundle pacing and left bundle branch pacing are emerging techniques that show promising success rates and broader applicability.
  • The article examines whether left bundle branch pacing is more effective than traditional biventricular pacing, supported by recent studies and guideline recommendations.

Article Abstract

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an effective method for increasing quality of life and life expectancy for many patients with heart failure. Due to the good results, this procedure is used frequently in Germany and has established itself as a class I indication in heart failure therapy. In addition to His bundle pacing, left bundle branch pacing has now also made a name for itself, as it shows a good success rate and can be used in a wider range of patients. Now the question arises as to whether left bundle branch pacing is superior to classic biventricular pacing and what the evidence situation is in this respect. This question shall be discussed in this article considering current studies and guideline recommendations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00399-024-01054-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bundle branch
12
branch pacing
12
pacing superior
8
superior classic
8
cardiac resynchronisation
8
resynchronisation therapy
8
heart failure
8
left bundle
8
pacing
5
[left bundle
4

Similar Publications

Recently published data suggested significantly lower pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) incidence with conduction system pacing (CSP). Because most data evaluated only the impact on the left ventricle, this study aimed to assess changes in echocardiographic parameters of morphology and function for all heart chambers in patients with baseline preserved and mid-range LVEF over a medium-term follow-up period after CSP. A total of 128 consecutive patients with LVEF > 40% and successful CSP for bradyarrhythmic indication were prospectively enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) needs confirmation of left conduction system capture assessed by testing of different electrical parameters. Guidelines recommend the use of an electrophysiological recording-system (EP-RS) to guide conduction system pacing (CSP) procedures. However, some experienced centers perform LBBAP procedures without an EP-RS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) by coordinating heart muscle segments, especially between papillary muscles, beyond just boosting left ventricular (LV) performance.
  • Eighteen patients with dilated cardiomyopathy underwent tests to measure heart function, and biventricular pacing showed a significant reduction in mitral regurgitation despite some patients showing no change in LV pressure.
  • The study concludes that CRT effectively lowers FMR independently of LV systolic function improvements, highlighting the importance of understanding its mechanisms for better treatment outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is effective for treating heart failure but is under-researched in patients with common comorbidities like atrial fibrillation (AF).
  • The SMART registry enrolled 2035 patients to assess CRT response based on clinical outcomes over 12 months, focusing on factors like all-cause mortality, hospitalizations, and quality of life.
  • Results showed 58.9% of patients improved, but factors like age, AF, and diabetes were linked to lower CRT responsiveness, with patients having AF experiencing higher rates of hospitalizations and mortality compared to those in normal rhythm.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Deep Septal Pacing for Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy.

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol

December 2024

Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, España.

Introduction: Right ventricular (RV) pacing can impair left ventricular function and cause heart failure, known as pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Upgrade to cardiac resynchronization (CRT) is its usual treatment; recently left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has emerged as a potential alternative. Deep septal pacing (DSP), a simplified alternative to LBBAP, is still able to achieve narrower paced QRS than during conventional RV pacing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!