Despite numerous studies on the magnitude of differential item functioning (DIF), different DIF detection methods often define effect sizes inconsistently and fail to adequately account for testing conditions. To address these limitations, this study introduces the unified M-DIF model, which defines the magnitude of DIF as the difference in item difficulty parameters between reference and focal groups. The M-DIF model can incorporate various DIF detection methods and test conditions to form a quantitative model. The pretrained approach was employed to leverage a sufficiently representative large sample as the training set and ensure the model's generalizability. Once the pretrained model is constructed, it can be directly applied to new data. Specifically, a training dataset comprising 144 combinations of test conditions and 144,000 potential DIF items, each equipped with 29 statistical metrics, was used. We adopt the XGBoost method for modeling. Results show that, based on root mean square error (RMSE) and BIAS metrics, the M-DIF model outperforms the baseline model in both validation sets: under consistent and inconsistent test conditions. Across all 360 combinations of test conditions (144 consistent and 216 inconsistent with the training set), the M-DIF model demonstrates lower RMSE in 357 cases (99.2%), illustrating its robustness. Finally, we provided an empirical example to showcase the practical feasibility of implementing the M-DIF model.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562883PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00131644241279882DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

m-dif model
20
test conditions
16
model
9
magnitude differential
8
differential item
8
item functioning
8
pretrained model
8
dif detection
8
detection methods
8
training set
8

Similar Publications

Despite numerous studies on the magnitude of differential item functioning (DIF), different DIF detection methods often define effect sizes inconsistently and fail to adequately account for testing conditions. To address these limitations, this study introduces the unified M-DIF model, which defines the magnitude of DIF as the difference in item difficulty parameters between reference and focal groups. The M-DIF model can incorporate various DIF detection methods and test conditions to form a quantitative model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The classical definition of mesophyll conductance (g ) represents an apparent parameter (g ) as it places (photo)respired CO at the same compartment where the carboxylation by Rubisco takes place. Recently, Tholen and co-workers developed a framework, in which g better describes a physical diffusional parameter (g ). They partitioned mesophyll resistance (r = 1/g ) into two components, cell wall and plasmalemma resistance (r ) and chloroplast resistance (r ), and showed that g is sensitive to the ratio of photorespiratory (F) and respiratory (R ) CO release to net CO uptake (A): g = g /[1 + ω(F + R )/A], where ω is the fraction of r in r .

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!