AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the effectiveness of lenvatinib in treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and identified key factors influencing patient survival.
  • This involved analyzing data from 53 patients on lenvatinib monotherapy and 19 patients on a combination therapy of lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
  • The results showed that while the combination therapy had a higher response rate, there were no significant differences in progression-free survival or overall survival between the two groups, although specific patient criteria from the monotherapy group indicated better outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: Given the significant advancements in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the emergence of novel treatment approaches, establishing reliable predictors has become crucial for optimizing patient selection and therapeutic sequencing in HCC. In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and treatment efficacy associated with lenvatinib-based therapy.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 53 patients receiving lenvatinib monotherapy, and 19 patients receiving lenvatinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy as their first-line systemic treatment for unresectable HCC at a single medical center. We employed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to ascertain the factors influencing survival in these cohorts.

Results: For lenvatinib monotherapy and the combination therapy, the objective response rates were 30.2% and 63.2%, respectively (P=0.03); the median progression-free survival (PFS) durations were 7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.5-9.5] and 12 months (95% CI: 6.4-17.6), respectively (P=0.74); and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached in either group (P=0.93). Although patients receiving the combination therapy had a greater treatment response, no significant survival differences were observed between the lenvatinib monotherapy and combination therapy subgroups, even after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Patients who received lenvatinib monotherapy could be stratified based on a combination of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade (either grade 1 or 2a) and a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of ≤5.8. Compared to the other subgroups combined, those who met both of these criteria exhibited PFS with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.382 (95% CI: 0.168-0.871; P=0.02), corresponding to 11 and 5 months, respectively; and an OS (HR: 0.198, 95% CI: 0.043-0.920; P=0.04) of not reached versus 12 months, respectively, according to multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Conclusions: In our study cohort, there were no statistically significant differences observed in the survival rates between patients treated with lenvatinib monotherapy and those treated with a combination of lenvatinib and immunotherapy. The incorporation of ALBI grade and NLR facilitates the stratification of survival outcomes in patients with unresectable HCC undergoing lenvatinib monotherapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565097PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-351DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lenvatinib monotherapy
24
combination therapy
16
patients receiving
12
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
lenvatinib
8
receiving lenvatinib
8
unresectable hcc
8
multivariate cox
8
cox regression
8
monotherapy combination
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: The combination therapy of lenvatinib and immunotherapy as first-line treatment remains controversial in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). This research aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib monotherapy (L) and combination therapy of lenvatinib and immune checkpoint inhibitor (LI) in lenvatinib-insensitive patients with uHCC.

Methods: Two hundred fifty-five uHCC patients were enrolled in this study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common types of urogenital cancer. The introduction of immune-based combinations, including dual immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has radically changed the treatment landscape for metastatic RCC, showing varying efficacy across different prognostic groups based on the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective multicenter study, part of the ARON-1 project, aimed to evaluate the outcomes of favorable-risk metastatic RCC patients treated with immune-based combinations or sunitinib.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Lenvatinib is a key treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that works by blocking critical growth factor receptors, which helps reduce tumor growth and improves immune response.
  • - Although lenvatinib is effective on its own, drug resistance is a growing issue due to factors like genetic mutations and changes in the tumor environment.
  • - Combining lenvatinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors could enhance treatment effectiveness, but challenges related to safety remain, highlighting the need for research on resistance mechanisms and biomarkers for better personalized therapies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Advanced Unresectable Differentiated Thyroid Cancer With Anaplastic Transformation: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Cureus

November 2024

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Ministry of the National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah, SAU.

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common subtype of thyroid cancer (TC). Although surgery and radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) generally yield favorable outcomes, advanced cases with extensive local invasion and metastases pose significant challenges. We report the case of a 65-year-old male with advanced, inoperable PTC characterized by extensive local invasion and distant metastases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This study compared the relative efficacy of first-line lenvatinib, a standard-of-care treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), vs licensed/license in-progress comparators. Using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and network meta-analysis (NMA), updated evidence for lenvatinib monotherapy from LEAP-002, in addition to evidence from REFLECT, was included in the analyses.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via systematic review.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!