Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the tumors with the highest morbidity and mortality rates in China and the world. Regorafenib is a targeted drug for standard third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Regorafenib monotherapy has shown certain efficacy in the elderly population, but more robust evidence is needed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosing characteristics, prognosis, and safety of regorafenib monotherapy in elderly Chinese patients with mCRC.
Methods: This retrospective study comprised elderly patients (aged ≥60 years) with mCRC who received regorafenib monotherapy as a third-line or above treatment in 10 hospitals from August 2017 to June 2020. We analyzed the association between different dosing regimens and prognosis. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and other endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs).
Results: In total, 203 patients were included in the analysis. The median PFS was 3.88 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.48-5.65], and the median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI: 8.94-12.1). There was no significant difference in the survival curves between the different dosage groups. The multivariate Cox analysis showed a significant benefit in OS in the high final daily dose group (120-160 mg/day) [hazard ratio (HR): 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25-0.84, P=0.01], which was further confirmed by the propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. No significant association was found between the initial daily dose and prognosis. Nor was any significant association found between PFS and drug dosage. Subsequently, an age subgroup analysis was conducted using 70 years as the cut-off value. In those aged <70 years, the application of higher final doses (120-160 mg/day) was significantly associated with the prolongation of OS compared to a final dose of 80 mg/day [HR (95% CI): 0.38 (0.16-0.91), P=0.03], and the prolongation of OS was predominantly observed in the 120 mg/day dose group [HR (95% CI): 0.24 (0.09-0.67), P=0.006]. Besides, we observed a statistically insignificant increase in the incidence of AEs in the higher dose group compared to the lower dose group.
Conclusions: Regorafenib monotherapy was shown to be efficacious in the elderly population, but further evidence is needed for guidance. Based on our multicenter real-world investigation, the final daily dose was significantly associated with OS. For those aged <70 years, maintaining the final dose at 120 mg/day may have prognostic advantages. The suggested medication protocol requires validation through comprehensive clinical trials.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565098 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jgo-24-464 | DOI Listing |
Neuro Oncol
January 2025
Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen; Tübingen, Germany.
Background: Registered systemic treatment options for glioblastoma patients are limited. The phase II REGOMA trial suggested an improvement of median overall survival in progressive glioblastoma by the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor regorafenib. This has not been confirmed by GBM AGILE.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Oncol
December 2024
Oncologia Medica, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli-IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Background: There is ongoing discussion around the optimal course of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) following the second line. Trifluridine/tipiracil (T) and regorafenib (R) have been the mainstay of therapy in this situation, as they both increased overall survival (OS) in comparison to a placebo. Despite the paucity of evidence, therapy rechallenge is also recognized as an option for practical use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFOncologist
December 2024
Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34147 Trieste, Italy.
Background: Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive primary central nervous system tumor characterized by poor outcomes. In case of relapse or progression to adjuvant chemotherapy, there is no univocal preferred regimen for relapsing glioblastoma.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review and Bayesian trial-level network meta-analyses (NMA) to identify the regimens associated with the best outcomes.
Cancer Res Treat
November 2024
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the real-world effectiveness and safety of regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in Taiwan.
Materials And Methods: Data were extracted from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database to evaluate the clinical outcomes of mCRC patients treated with either regorafenib or TAS-102 between 2016 and 2019. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox's proportional hazard models, adjusting for age, gender, Quan-CCI score, liver metastases, number of metastatic sites, and the use of anti-EGFR medications.
J Gastrointest Oncol
October 2024
Department of Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the tumors with the highest morbidity and mortality rates in China and the world. Regorafenib is a targeted drug for standard third-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Regorafenib monotherapy has shown certain efficacy in the elderly population, but more robust evidence is needed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!