Feasibility of collecting long-term patient-reported outcome data in burns patients using a centralised approach.

Burns

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Wales.

Published: October 2024

Background: Collecting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has been a longstanding priority for the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ). An earlier pilot of hospital-led PROM collection encountered low participation rates and high loss to follow-up, indicating consideration for an alternative model was warranted.

Aims: To establish the feasibility of implementing centralised long-term PROM collection within the BRANZ.

Methods: Two burn services participated in this prospective, longitudinal pilot. PROMs were collected from patients admitted to the services between January and December 2021 who survived to discharge. Follow-up occurred via telephone or online self-completion at three, six, and 12 months post-injury using burn-specific and generic health-related quality-of-life measures.

Results: There were 450 patients (423 adult patients [≥ 16 years] and 27 paediatric patients [< 16 years]) who could be contacted and agreed to participate in the follow-ups. Most patients initially opted for telephone rather than online self-completion (n = 305, 67.5 %). No key sociodemographic or injury event factors were associated with specifically opting for online self-completion. The follow-up rates were 81.1 % at three months, 81.9 % at six months, and 77.3 % at 12 months. Data missingness was low (i.e., < 2 %) for all instrument items, excluding the visual analogue scale scores of the 5-Level EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire and the two paediatric burn-specific measures.

Conclusions: Collecting PROMs from burns patients in the first 12 months after injury via a centralised approach was shown to be feasible, with higher participation rates and low missingness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2024.107304DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

online self-completion
12
patient-reported outcome
8
burns patients
8
centralised approach
8
prom collection
8
participation rates
8
telephone online
8
patients
7
feasibility collecting
4
collecting long-term
4

Similar Publications

Background: The outcome prioritisation tool (OPT) is a simple tool to ascertain the health outcome priorities of people with MLTC. Use of this tool in people aged under 65 years with MLTC has not previously been investigated. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using the OPT in people with MLTC aged 45 years or above, in a multi-ethnic primary-care setting and describe the health outcome priorities of people with MLTC by age, clusters of long-term conditions and demographic factors, and to investigate any differences in prioritisation in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does injury type influence patient preference, response rates, and data completeness for online or telephone follow-up following injury?

Injury

November 2024

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Population Data Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, UK.

Introduction: Collecting patient-reported outcomes in a systematic fashion is important to understand recovery trajectories and compare performance between different services and fields of care. These outcomes can be collected through a variety of means, but studies comparing different follow-up methods in patients with a variety of injury types are scarce. This study aimed to compare follow-up data from three injury registries to quantify patient preference for telephone versus online follow-up, determine factors associated with choosing online follow-up, and compare response rates based on the patient's preferred follow-up method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Feasibility of collecting long-term patient-reported outcome data in burns patients using a centralised approach.

Burns

October 2024

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Wales.

Background: Collecting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has been a longstanding priority for the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ). An earlier pilot of hospital-led PROM collection encountered low participation rates and high loss to follow-up, indicating consideration for an alternative model was warranted.

Aims: To establish the feasibility of implementing centralised long-term PROM collection within the BRANZ.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is a rare platelet function disorder that results in severe bleeding. We assessed clinical symptoms and psychological parameters to identify the unmet needs associated with GT.

Objectives: Glanzmann's 360 is a mixed-methods study designed to give a contemporary snapshot of the impact of living with GT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The opening up of the laws to medicinal cannabis in recent years is a key factor in the growth of this therapy, but there is little information about what nurses know and think about it. The present paper seeks to analyze the knowledge, opinions, and experiences of nurses and nursing students in Portugal regarding the use of cannabis and to understand gender differences.

Methods: A self-completion questionnaire was drawn up and published online.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!