Background: Periprosthetic knee fracture (PPKF) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be difficult to treat. A PPKF can be treated both operatively and nonoperatively, and the treatment varies between fracture sites. This study aimed to assess the risk of reoperation according to the fracture site and treatment of the PPKF.

Method: This study is a nationwide cohort study using register data from 1997 to 2022. Cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilized primary TKA were identified from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Subsequent PPKFs, fracture treatments, and later reoperations were identified through the International Classification of Diseases, tenth edition (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes in the Danish National Patient Register. In addition, indications for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) in the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register were used to identify PPKFs and the reason for reoperation.

Results: We included 1,931 PPKFs (1,494 femoral, 207 patellae, and 230 tibial) with an overall two-year reoperation risk of 20% (95% confidence interval (CI): 18 to 23). Femoral PPKFs had a two-year reoperation risk of 16% (CI: 12 to 22) after nonoperative treatment and 21% (CI: 18 to 24) after operative treatment. Patellar PPKFs had a two-year reoperation risk in five to 17 after nonoperative treatment and 46% (CI: 30 to 69) after operative treatment. Tibial PPKFs had a two-year reoperation risk of 17% (CI: 11 to 27) after nonoperative treatment and 36% (25 to 53) after operative treatment.

Conclusions: The overall two-year reoperation risk was 20% (CI: 18 to 23). Operative-treated PPKFs had a higher risk of reoperation across all fracture locations. The highest reoperation risk was found after operatively treated patella and tibial PPKFs (46 and 36%, respectively), and the lowest reoperation risk was found after nonoperative-treated patella PPKFs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reoperation risk
28
knee arthroplasty
20
two-year reoperation
20
total knee
12
ppkfs two-year
12
nonoperative treatment
12
risk
9
reoperation
9
ppkfs
9
periprosthetic knee
8

Similar Publications

Aims: The purpose of this study was to directly compare the Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) Mobile Bearing Hip System (Stryker, USA) and large femoral heads (LFHs) in revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) at mid-term follow-up, with specific emphasis on survival free of re-revision for dislocation, any re-revision, dislocation, and the risk of metal-related complications.

Methods: We identified 299 revision THAs performed at a single tertiary care academic institution from March 2011 to July 2014. Aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (n = 65), dislocation (n = 58), and reimplantation as part of a two-stage exchange protocol (n = 57) were the most common reasons for index revision.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Tibial fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) can present surgical challenges. It has been suggested that appropriate fixation in at least two of the three anatomical zones (epiphysis, metaphysis, and diaphysis) is essential for implant survival. However, supporting clinical data are lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study reports the authors' experience with surgical interventions for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. They assessed open surgery and minimally invasive endoscopic suturectomy in terms of periprocedural outcomes and related risk factors for postoperative complications and reoperation. This study aimed to provide insights toward surgical approach decisions and lay the groundwork for future prospective studies in this field.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background:  Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common pathology in daily practice of neurosurgery. Surgical management usually offers a significant clinical recovery. However, the recurrence rate is still high.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Dislocation is a major concern following total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis (OA). Both dual-mobility components and standard acetabular components with large femoral heads are used to reduce the risk of dislocation. We investigated whether dual-mobility components are superior to standard components in reducing the two-year dislocation and revision risk in a propensity-matched sample from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!