Traumatic adult brachial plexus injury is a debilitating injury. Myoelectric exoskeletons are functional tools for restoring elbow flexion. Electromyography signals are used for exoskeleton control, but a characterization specific to the traumatic adult brachial plexus injury population has yet to be performed. This study evaluated if adult patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury and a reconstructed elbow flexor can control a myoelectric exoskeleton. Adult patients who underwent surgical intervention to restore elbow flexion with traumatic brachial plexus injury were recruited for this cross-sectional study. The processed elbow flexor muscle signal and activation thresholds were used to evaluate criteria for exoskeleton control algorithm development. A single activation threshold can be utilized for exoskeleton control, but the calibration routine should consider the resting signal for both extended and flexed elbow positions. The data indicated a 'settle-time' following contraction is needed to prevent unintentional movement of the exoskeleton. All patients activated their elbow flexor above the activation threshold in the supported, flexed position. However, there were different abilities to generate multiple, discrete signals. These results were not specific to surgery, nerve implemented for reconstruction, or post-operative recovery time. Patients with a brachial plexus injury and a reconstructed elbow flexor demonstrated subject-specific capabilities for exoskeleton control.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2024.102944 | DOI Listing |
Microsurgery
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background: Free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) for brachial plexus injury (BPI) requires adequate donor arterial flow for successful anastomosis. However, concomitant BPI and subclavian artery injury are not uncommon. Arteriovenous (AV) loop graft is one of the methods used to extend vessels to areas with vascular depletion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Hand Surg Am
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Nossa Senhora da Conceição Hospital, Tubarão, Brazil.
Purpose: Brachial plexus traction injuries have conventionally been categorized as involving the C5-C6, C5-C7, C5-T1, and C8-T1 roots. In this article, we report a distinct clinical presentation of brachial plexus injury characterized by intact finger flexion with signs of complete brachial plexus injury.
Methods: From 2010 to 2022, 989 patients who sustained brachial plexus injuries were examined and underwent surgery.
J Clin Med
December 2024
Unit of Hand Surgery, Microsurgery and Reconstructive, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, CTO Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) is a flaccid paralysis of the upper limbs that occurs in about 0.4 percent of live births. This condition can produce permanent disabilities; to date, there is no consensus on protocols to be applied for the rehabilitation of children with this condition.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiagnostics (Basel)
December 2024
PhysiUZerapy: Health Sciences Research Group, University of Zaragoza, Calle Domingo Miral S/N, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
Background: When performing the Upper Limb Neurodynamic Test 1 (ULNT1), the order of joint movement can be varied to place more stress onto certain nerve segments. However, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are still unclear. This study aimed to analyze the differences in the stiffness of the median nerve (MN) and the brachial plexus (BP) using ultrasound shear wave elastography during three sequences of the ULNT1: standard (ULNT1-STD), distal-to-proximal (ULNT1-DIST), and proximal-to-distal (ULNT1-PROX).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBrain Sci
December 2024
Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China.
Radiation therapy is widely recognized as an efficacious modality for treating neoplasms located within the craniofacial region. Nevertheless, this approach is not devoid of risks, predominantly concerning potential harm to the neural structures. Adverse effects may encompass focal cerebral necrosis, cognitive function compromise, cerebrovascular pathology, spinal cord injury, and detriment to the neural fibers constituting the brachial plexus.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!