Uses of the viable validity concept: A systematic scoping review.

Eval Program Plann

Bordeaux Population Health Research Center U 1219, Inserm - University of Bordeaux, Case 11, 146 rue Léon Saignat, Bordeaux Cedexx 33076,  France; Bordeaux University Hospital -Saint-André Hospital, 1 rue Jean Burguet, Bordeaux 33000, France. Electronic address:

Published: February 2025

Objective: The concept of viable validity was first defined in 2010 within the framework of the integrative validity model. The concept has continued to evolve in the intervening years, and the purpose of this systematic scoping review is to describe and analyze the ways in which it has been deployed and appropriated by various research traditions.

Methods: We began by including all articles which cite Chen's original article "The bottom-up approach to integrative validity: a new perspective for program evaluation (Eval Program Plann. 2010;33(3):205-14) and/or contain the terms "viable validity" or "viable cogency," sourced from 5 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Psycinfo and ResearchGate).

Results: we selected and included 31 articles published between 2011 and 2022. These studies fall into three major research traditions (evaluation science, population health intervention research and humanities and social sciences), providing a broad overview of the conceptual mobilization of viable validity. Paradoxically, our literature reveals the concept of viable validity to be poorly operationalized and only partially mature, owing to a lack of consensus among the research traditions with regard to its definition, as well as the porous boundaries between this concept and adjacent concepts such as feasibility and acceptability.

Conclusion: Viable validity is a complex concept, and its operational application constitutes a major challenge for research into and evaluation of population health interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102516DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

viable validity
20
systematic scoping
8
scoping review
8
concept viable
8
integrative validity
8
population health
8
concept
6
validity
6
viable
5
validity concept
4

Similar Publications

The clinical application of doxorubicin (DOX) is limited due to its cardiotoxicity, which is primarily attributed to its interaction with iron in mitochondria, leading to lipid peroxidation and myocardial ferroptosis. This study aimed to investigate the role of the gut microbiota-derived metabolite, indole-3-lactic acid (ILA), in mitigating DOX-induced cardiotoxicity (DIC). Cardiac function, pathological changes, and myocardial ferroptosis were assessed in vivo.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) are an important game bird that generates substantial revenue for rural communities and is also an important grassland conservation species. Unfortunately, Northern bobwhite populations have been declining across their range for over 50 years. In the southwest bobwhite range, parasites are suspected to contribute substantially to the decline.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The biopharmaceutical industry is shifting toward employing digital analytical tools for improved understanding of systems biology data and production of quality products. The implementation of these technologies can streamline the manufacturing process by enabling faster responses, reducing manual measurements, and building continuous and automated capabilities. This study discusses the use of soft sensor models for prediction of viability and viable cell density (VCD) in CHO cell culture processes by using in-line optical density and permittivity sensors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Validation of the Children's International Cognitive Ability Resource (Ch-ICAR).

Behav Res Methods

January 2025

Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

The International Cognitive Ability Resource, abbreviated ICAR, counters some of the practical problems researchers face when using good, but proprietary, licensed intelligence tests like the Wechsler tests, which include unfeasible administration times and financial costs. So far, ICAR has been validated for adolescents and adults in many countries, offering a viable test alternative for these populations. For use among children, however, the appropriateness of this resource was yet unknown.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!