Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of the 28-item Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS-28) in detecting multiorgan dysfunction (MOD) among critically ill obstetric patients and compared its predictive potential to other severity models, such as Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Mortality Probability Model II (MPM II).
Methods: A prospective multicentre cohort study was conducted including obstetric patients, pregnant and up to 42 days postpartum, admitted to the intensive care units of two referral hospitals in Colombia. A total of 93 patients were recruited between March 2016 and February 2017 and from September 2019 to November 2019. Scores from the MPM II, SOFA, and TISS-28 were calculated within the first 24 h post-intensive care unit admission. The primary outcome was to evaluate the effectiveness of TISS-28 in predicting MOD, as defined by the World Health Organization near-miss criteria. We compared the TISS-28 with SOFA and MPM II scores in identifying MOD using the positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Results: Data from 93 patients were analysed, of whom 22 developed MOD. Hypertensive disorders were the predominant diagnosis (n = 62; 66.7%). Patients with sepsis exhibited the highest TISS-28 score, indicating more intensive therapeutic interventions. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for TISS-28, SOFA, and MPM II were 0.83 (95% confidence interval: 0.73-0.92), 0.66 (0.51-0.80), and 0.59 (0.43-0.74), respectively (p = 0.001). The cut-off value of a TISS-28 score ≥21 was associated with an increased likelihood of MOD (sensitivity: 83.2%, specificity: 71.2%), a positive predictive value of 47.3%, and a negative predictive value) of 93.2%.
Conclusions: TISS-28 demonstrated robust performance in identifying MOD among obstetric patients compared to other severity indexes. The TISS-28 score complements physiology-derived severity scores by reflecting the level of care required, making it a valuable tool in risk stratification and resource allocation for critically ill obstetric patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101137 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!