AI Article Synopsis

  • Postoperative pain management for hip arthroscopy is complicated, prompting a study on the effectiveness of femoral nerve block (FNB) with different concentrations of ropivacaine for pain relief compared to intra-articular injection (IAI).
  • The study involved 148 patients divided into three groups and measured outcomes such as pain scores, opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction within 24 hours post-surgery.
  • Results indicated that FNB, especially at a 0.4% ropivacaine concentration, provided better pain relief after 24 hours and reduced the need for opioids compared to IAI, though it may delay ambulation and requires special equipment and training.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative pain management is challenging for hip arthroscopy, and the effectiveness and specific protocols of femoral nerve block (FNB) in hip surgeries remain insufficient. Therefore, we designed this study to investigate the analgesic efficacy and optimal drug concentrations of FNB after hip arthroscopy.

Methods: A total of 148 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were included and randomly divided into three groups: 0.3% ropivacaine FNB group, 0.4% ropivacaine FNB group, and 0.4% ropivacaine intra-articular injection (IAI) group (positive control). The main outcomes included dynamic and static visual analog scale (VAS) scores at various time points postoperatively, total intraoperative remifentanil consumption, and cumulative consumption of morphine within 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included total intraoperative dexmedetomidine consumption, RASMAY sedation scores, and patients' satisfaction scores postoperatively.

Results: Both FNB and IAI anesthesia were shown to be safe for post-hip arthroscopy analgesia. Compared with IAI anesthesia, FNB showed no significant differences in analgesic effect within 12 h postoperatively but had a better analgesic effect after 24 h and lower remifentanil consumption intraoperatively. Group 0.4% ropivacaine showed lower dynamic VAS scores within the first 12 h compared with 0.3% ropivacaine for FNB, however, there were no significant differences in patient satisfaction and sedation, and postoperative ambulation was delayed, indicating that the higher concentration of ropivacaine correlated with a longer time to ambulation. The IAI group had greater intraoperative opioid consumption and more side effects.

Conclusions: Compared with IAI anesthesia, FNB can better alleviate post-hip arthroscopy pain and reduce opioid consumption. However, it requires specialized equipment and technical support and carries a certain risk of puncture.

Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2400091579).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40122-024-00681-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

post-hip arthroscopy
12
ropivacaine fnb
12
group 04%
12
04% ropivacaine
12
iai anesthesia
12
analgesic efficacy
8
femoral nerve
8
nerve block
8
arthroscopy pain
8
hip arthroscopy
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Postoperative pain management for hip arthroscopy is complicated, prompting a study on the effectiveness of femoral nerve block (FNB) with different concentrations of ropivacaine for pain relief compared to intra-articular injection (IAI).
  • The study involved 148 patients divided into three groups and measured outcomes such as pain scores, opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction within 24 hours post-surgery.
  • Results indicated that FNB, especially at a 0.4% ropivacaine concentration, provided better pain relief after 24 hours and reduced the need for opioids compared to IAI, though it may delay ambulation and requires special equipment and training.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Although hip bracing after hip arthroscopy is relatively common, it is not an evidence-based practice; no comparative studies or clinical trials exploring its effectiveness exist.

Purpose: We sought to summarize the rates of and indications for hip bracing after hip arthroscopy, surgeons' preferences on braces, and the types of braces used.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases to identify studies that examined hip bracing following hip arthroscopy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To determine whether intra-articular injections of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) with hyaluronan (HA)-based scaffold improve articular cartilage regeneration in chondral injuries caused by mixed-femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) over a period longer than 24 months post-hip arthroscopy.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, patients with mixed-FAIS and chondral injury ≥ IIIB according to the International Cartilage Regeneration and Joint Preservation Society grade or III/IV of Konan/Haddad classification underwent intra-articular injection of PBSC with an HA-based scaffold and micro-drillings during hip arthroscopy. The degree of chondral repair was measured at baseline and 5 years using the International Cartilage Repair Society morphologic score system (MSS) as the primary outcome.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: Chronic pain is a risk factor for worse outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Pain sensitization involves the central nervous system perceiving previously innocuous stimuli as noxious. Temporal summation can provide a surrogate measure of sensitization, and may be a clinical tool to identify patients at a higher risk for poor post-hip arthroscopy outcomes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Late post-arthroscopy hip instability. Diagnosis, treatment, and 5-year follow-up: A case report.

Int J Surg Case Rep

February 2024

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Valle del Lili, Cali, Colombia; School of Health Sciences, Universidad ICESI, Cali, Colombia. Electronic address:

Introduction: Hip instability following arthroscopy is a rare complication with a clinical spectrum ranging from gross dislocation (macro-instability) to micro-instability, characterized by pain and limitation for daily activities. Therefore, it should be considered as a potential differential diagnosis in patients experiencing persistent pain after hip arthroscopy.

Case Presentation: A 41-year-old male presented with a history of anterior hip dislocation and macro-instability symptoms three years post-hip arthroscopy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!