Anterolateral approaches to the lumbar spine provide direct access to the disc space. These techniques facilitate thorough discectomy, which is essential for successful arthrodesis. They improve segmental lordosis without osteotomy and indirectly decompress neural elements in carefully selected patients. Benefits include shorter operative times, reduced blood loss, and rapid postoperative mobilization compared to posterior approaches. Each technique has specific advantages and limitations, thus none is inherently superior to another. Detailed knowledge of these techniques is essential for modern spine surgeon to provide personalized operative plan for each patient.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2024.08.009 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Letter to the Editor: 'Short-Term Comparison Between Unilateral Versus Bilateral Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in Short-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-A Prospective Randomized Study' by Akihiko Hiyama et al.
Global Spine J
January 2025
Department of orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Letter to the Editor: 'Subsidence Rates Associated With Porous 3D-Printed Versus Solid Titanium Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion' by Toop et al.
Global Spine J
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
3D-printed porous titanium versus polyetheretherketone cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of subsidence.
Front Med (Lausanne)
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Article Synopsis
- Cage subsidence can negatively affect lumbar fusion procedures, with material selection (PEEK vs. 3D-Ti) influencing this issue; the study aims to compare their subsidence rates.
- The systematic search reviewed 265 patients from three high-quality studies, focusing on cage subsidence and classified subsidence rates using a specific method.
- Results indicated that 3D-Ti cages have a significantly lower rate of subsidence compared to PEEK cages, with less severe subsidence and better overall performance.
Efficacy evaluation of a minimally invasive surgical procedure (oblique lateral interbody fusion) for lumbar spinal tuberculosis-retrospective cohort study.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Objective: In the current study, to demonstrate the advantages of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), we focused on the therapeutics for lumbar spinal tuberculosis with the comparison of three treatments, including anterior approach, posterior approach, and OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation.
Methods: This study included patients with lumbar spinal tuberculosis from July 2015 to June 2018. We divided these patients into three groups: 35 patients underwent an anterior-only approach (Group A), 36 patients underwent a posterior-only approach (Group B), and 31 patients underwent OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (Group C).
Purpose: Synthetic cages are commonly used in posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Using morselized corticocancellous bone from spinous processes and laminae has been suggested as an alternative, especially in low-resource settings where access to synthetic cages is limited. The aim of this study was to compare radiographic and functional outcomes of synthetic cages with those of morselized local autograft.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!