Background And Objectives: Wrong blood in tube (WBIT) continues to be a preventable cause of unintended harm to the patient. The literature describing extent of the problem, its consequences and factors leading to WBIT from the perspective of lower middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. The present study describes WBIT and its outcome in a hospital-based blood centre from an LMIC.
Materials And Methods: WBIT events occurring during the study period were analysed to identify the root cause. In addition, they were analysed according to discipline, department and time of sample draw. Root causes were divided and compared with standard operating procedure (SOP) for sample collection for blood requests. All WBIT events were followed and their outcomes analysed.
Results: WBIT events occurred at a rate of 4.8/10,000 blood requests, with a higher rate in urgent requests (5.2/10,000 requests). The average rate of WBIT was higher in surgical disciplines compared to medical and acute care services (6.58 vs. 4.43 vs. 3/10,000 requests). The highest rate of WBIT was observed when requests were received during 8:00 PM-2:00 AM (p = 0.02). Deviations from SOP with contribution from human and organizational elements were identified as the root cause. The consequences ranged from delay in providing blood to acute haemolytic transfusion reactions.
Conclusion: We found that WBITs occurred at a rate comparable to that reported from developed countries. Use of software and automation may reduce the rate of WBIT but not eliminate it completely. Strict adherence to SOPs and continuous training of phlebotomy staff would help reduce it to a minimum. Blood centres need to develop specific strategies with respect to their root causes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/vox.13767 | DOI Listing |
Vox Sang
November 2024
Department of Transfusion Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Background And Objectives: Wrong blood in tube (WBIT) continues to be a preventable cause of unintended harm to the patient. The literature describing extent of the problem, its consequences and factors leading to WBIT from the perspective of lower middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. The present study describes WBIT and its outcome in a hospital-based blood centre from an LMIC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransfusion
October 2023
University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, California, USA.
Background: Collecting a patient's blood in a correctly labeled pretransfusion specimen tube is essential for accurate ABO typing and safe transfusion. Noncompliance with specimen collection procedures can lead to wrong blood in tube (WBIT) incidents with potentially fatal consequences. Recent WBIT events inspired the investigation of how various institutions currently reduce the risk of these errors and ensure accurate ABO typing of patient samples.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Clin Pathol
August 2022
UF Health Shands Hospital, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Objectives: Transfusions remain a complicated procedure involving many disciplines performing various steps. Pretransfusion specimen identification errors remain a concern. Over the past two decades, system changes have been made and minimal improvements in the error rates have been seen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransfusion
April 2022
Division of Transfusion Medicine and Tissue Bank, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background: The second blood group determination or group check sample is a process of verifying the ABO group with a second blood sample prior to transfusion. It has been used to detect errors related to wrong blood in tube (WBIT) events and reduce the risk of ABO-incompatible transfusions. To prevent the clinical team from collecting the group check sample at the same time as the first sample, a tan top tube only available from the blood bank was introduced for second blood group determinations if drawn within 24 h of the first group and screen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransfus Med
August 2014
Haematology Department, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the introduction of two-sample policy for transfusion at our hospital and reduction of the risk of ABO incompatible transfusion.
Background: ABO incompatible transfusion can be a fatal but avoidable event. Wrong blood in tube is a cause of ABO incompatible transfusion and there are various strategies available to try and expunge this event.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!