Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Problem: Current spirometers face challenges in evaluating acceptability criteria, often requiring manual visual inspection by trained specialists. Automating this process could improve diagnostic workflows and reduce variability in test assessments.
Aim: This study aimed to apply transfer learning to convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to automate the classification of spirometry flow-volume curves based on acceptability criteria.
Methods: A total of 5287 spirometry flow-volume curves were divided into three categories: (A) all criteria met, (B) early termination, and (C) non-acceptable results. Six CNN models (VGG16, InceptionV3, Xception, ResNet152V2, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet121) were trained using a balanced dataset after data augmentation. The models' performance was evaluated on part of the original unbalanced dataset with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.
Results: VGG16 achieved the highest accuracy at 93.9 %, while ResNet152V2 had the lowest at 83.0 %. Non-acceptable curves (Group C) were the easiest to classify, with precision reaching at least 87.7 %. Early termination curves (Group B) were the most challenging, with precision ranging from 75.0 % to 90.3 %.
Conclusion: CNN models, particularly VGG16, show promise in automating spirometry quality control, potentially reducing the need for manual inspection by specialized technicians. This approach can streamline spirometry assessments, offering consistent, high-quality diagnostics even in non-specialized or low-resource environments.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109341 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!