A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Treatment preferences of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer: A discrete choice experiment. | LitMetric

Background: When faced with treatment options, patients are asked to participate in decision-making. We sought to determine which treatment aspects matter most for individuals treated for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), with an aim to improve understanding of patient preferences and what trade-offs patients are willing to accept. Our study consisted of a discrete choice experiment (DCE): a type of questionnaire used to elicit preferences in the absence of real-world choice.

Methods: The DCE had five attributives, each with three levels. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire in which they were asked to choose between two hypothetical MIBC treatments. The data were analysed using a conditional logit model, and preferences for, and trade-offs between, attributes were estimated.

Results: We recruited patients with MIBC who had either already completed, were undergoing or had yet to commence radical treatment for MIBC ( = 60). Participants indicated a strong preference for treatments that increased their life expectancy ( = <0.001), had a lower risk of long-term complications ( = <0.001) and less changes to their body image ( = <0.001). Changes to sexual wellbeing ( = 0.09) or an increase in acute side effects ( = 0.99) did not influence preferences. Patients were willing to accept treatments with higher risk of long-term complications to improve their life expectancy or body image.

Conclusion: When deciding on the type of treatment, increased life expectancy is the most important consideration for people with MIBC. The risk of long-term complications and changes to overall body image as a result of treatment are also important. Our study also highlighted that patients are willing to accept a higher risk of long-term complications to improve other treatment outcomes. Understanding patient preferences is important for shared decision-making, which has an impact on quality of care for people living with MIBC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557266PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.443DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

muscle invasive
8
invasive bladder
8
bladder cancer
8
discrete choice
8
choice experiment
8
preferences trade-offs
8
treatment
4
treatment preferences
4
patients
4
preferences patients
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!