Background: Underutilization of bariatric surgery is multifactorial. This study aimed to understand the association of SDOH on not achieving surgery.

Methods: 1081 applications for primary MBS from January-December 2021 were stratified into those that completed surgery (COM; n = 415), in progress > 1-year (IP; n = 107), dropped out (DO; n = 379), and never started (NS; n = 180). Using the American-Community-Survey results (2015-2020) and patient zip-codes, population differences in 4-domains of SDOH (demographic/social/housing/economic) were examined between COM versus the other groups. Additionally, using institutional MBSAQIP and EMR data, patient-specific differences in comorbidities were evaluated for COM versus IP/DO. Univariate analysis using Kruskal-Wallis, chi-squared/Fisher's exact tests were used for continuous and/or categorical variables. For patient-level analysis multinomial logistic regression was used to determine predictors of not achieving surgery. Hypothesis testing was conducted at an overall 5 percent type-I error rate (alpha = 0.05) and Bonferroni's method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons.

Results: Compared to COM, IP-patients resided in zip-codes characterized by fewer married people (43% vs 46%; p = 0.019), lower education levels (49% vs 43%; p = 0.048), more households where rent was > 50% of household income (10% vs 8%, p = 0.002), and households below the poverty line (17.6% vs 14.5%, p = 0.017). At the patient-level, IP were more likely to be male (27.9% vs 14.9%; p = 0.014), publicly insured (44.9% vs 28.4%; p = 0.004), Black (35.5% vs 22.2%; p = 0.006), an active smoker (8.9% vs 2.2%; p = 0.018), have a higher BMI (49.6 vs 47.6; p = 0.01), and coronary intervention (5.8% vs 1.7%, p = 0.034). Comparison of COM vs DO was similar for both phases. Multinomial multivariable logistic regression demonstrated higher BMI (OR = 1.03,[CI]:1.01-1.05, p = 0.001), males (OR = 1.9,[CI]:1.09-3.32, p = 0.024), smoking (OR = 4.58,[CI]:1.74-12.02, p = 0.002), and Medicaid (OR = 2.16,[CI]:1.33-3.49, p = 0.002) independently predicted not achieving surgery.

Conclusion: Patient-level data demonstrated social not clinical factors predicted surgery completion. Given zip-codes characterizing the IP/DO groups had a greater prevalence of social risk, more attention needs to be directed patient-level social risks.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11364-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bariatric surgery
8
logistic regression
8
higher bmi
8
surgery
5
impact social
4
social determinants
4
determinants health
4
health sdoh
4
sdoh completing
4
completing bariatric
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) reversal might be necessary to alleviate refractory surgical or nutritional complications, such as postprandial hypoglycemia, malnutrition, marginal ulceration, malabsorption, chronic diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, chronic pain, or excessive weight loss. The surgical technique of RYGB reversal is not standardized; potential strategies include the following: (1) gastro-gastrostomy: hand-sewn technique, linear stapler, circular stapler; (2) handling of the Roux limb: reconnection or resection (if remaining intestinal length ≥ 4 m).

Case Presentation: We demonstrate the surgical technique of a laparoscopic reversal of RYGB with hand-sewn gastro-gastrostomy and resection of the alimentary limb with the aim of improving the patient's quality of life.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The difference in survival between sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains controversial.

Objective: To investigate the comparative survival difference between SG and RYGB in adults with morbid obesity.

Setting: A meta-analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

2015 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Presidential address.

Surg Obes Relat Dis

November 2024

Yale Department of Surgery; New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Metabolic bariatric surgery is the most effective therapy for severe obesity, which affects the health of millions, most of whom are women of child-bearing age. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are the most common bariatric procedures and are associated with durable weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Although obstetric outcomes broadly improve, the safety profile comparing the impact of RYGB and SG on obstetric outcomes is underexplored.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery is growing rapidly. The optimal approach to minimize complications remains unclear.

Objective: Assess robot utilization and compare 30-day outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!