AI Article Synopsis

  • The study addresses the challenge of hand reanimation for patients with total paralysis by comparing two surgical techniques: functional free gracilis muscle transfer and biceps tendon transfer to finger flexors.
  • Six patients were evaluated over an average follow-up of 7.5 years, with varying success rates based on the techniques used, as measured by the British Medical Research Council grading system.
  • The study concludes that while tendon transfer may be less complex and still effective, functional free muscle transfer is preferable when possible due to its potential for better long-term muscular strength in finger flexion.

Article Abstract

Objective: Hand reanimation for finger flexion in patients with total paralysis remains a reconstructive challenge, especially when tendon transfers or neurological reconstruction options are no longer viable. This study aimed to describe a series of patients without hand function by evaluating two hand reanimation techniques.

Methods: This observational retrospective study used a case series of hand reanimation. Two techniques were performed-functional free gracilis muscle transfer with microsurgical reconstruction, and transfer of the recovered biceps to the flexor digitorum profundus and flexor pollicis longus with tendon graft augmentation. The two groups, each undergoing one of the techniques, were evaluated for the final functional results using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading system.

Results: Six consecutive patients with total hand paralysis were included, with a mean final follow-up of 7.5 years. After intervention, two patients, one from each technique group, achieved a BMRC grade 2. In the group where tendon transfer of the biceps to the finger flexors was performed, two patients achieved a BMRC grade 3. Additionally, two patients who underwent functional free muscle transfer were achieved a BMRC grade 4.

Conclusion: The transfer of biceps to the finger flexors using tendon grafts, which involves fewer technical difficulties and reduced demands from the surgical team compared to functional free muscle transfer, is a viable alternative for treating patients requiring hand reanimation. However, functional free muscle transfer is recommended as the first option when technically feasible and adequate donor nerves are available, due to its potential for achieving greater final muscular strength in the finger flexors. Reconstructive microsurgeons can use both techniques as viable surgical options for hand reanimation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634357PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0719DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hand reanimation
24
functional free
16
muscle transfer
16
achieved bmrc
12
bmrc grade
12
finger flexors
12
free muscle
12
transfer
9
hand
8
reanimation functional
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!