AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates vaccine hesitancy among unvaccinated persons with mental illnesses (PMI) regarding COVID-19, highlighting their higher risk for infection and health issues.
  • Out of 100 participants, 62% were unwilling to get vaccinated, mainly due to believing they were not at risk and concerns about vaccine side effects.
  • The study suggests that addressing misconceptions, providing accurate information, and improving vaccine accessibility are critical for increasing vaccination rates among PMI, emphasizing the role of mental health professionals in this effort.

Article Abstract

Background: The risk of COVID-19 infection and related health consequences is higher among persons with mental illnesses (PMI). Vaccines have had an impact in reducing the morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection. Understanding the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in PMI is crucial for promoting vaccine acceptance in this population, but it remains an under-researched topic.

Aims: This cross-sectional study assessed perspectives among unvaccinated PMI regarding COVID-19 vaccination in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy in this population were explored.

Materials And Methods: One-hundred consecutive PMI attending the psychiatric outpatient clinic who had not taken the COVID-19 vaccination were recruited after obtaining informed consent. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to elicit knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding COVID-19 vaccination. The Oxford vaccine hesitancy scale was used to assess vaccine hesitancy; the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 were administered to assess current psychopathology.

Results: A majority of the participants (62%) were unwilling for the vaccination, the most common reasons being the perception that they were not at risk of infection, and worry about the possible side effects of the vaccination. Factors associated with low vaccine hesitancy were higher levels of education, greater perception of the risk of contracting the disease, belief that vaccination was effective, and easy accessibility to the vaccine.

Conclusion: Improving awareness, providing accurate information, and ensuring better accessibility to vaccines are necessary to improve vaccine coverage among PMI. Mental health professionals need to assume an active role in providing education and clarifying misconceptions among our vulnerable patient population to help mitigate vaccine hesitancy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11553621PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_7_24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vaccine hesitancy
24
covid-19 vaccination
16
persons mental
8
covid-19 infection
8
vaccine
8
factors associated
8
perception risk
8
vaccination
7
hesitancy
6
covid-19
5

Similar Publications

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound psychophysiological and socioeconomic effects worldwide. COVID-19 anxiety syndrome (CAS) is a specific cluster of maladaptive coping strategies, including perseveration and avoidance behaviours, in response to the perceived threat and fear of COVID-19. CAS is distinct from general COVID-19 anxiety.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Achieving safe influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant and breastfeeding women is a global health goal due to the potential risks of serious influenza for both mother and child. However, vaccine hesitancy remains a significant barrier to vaccination uptake. Since anxiety represents a determinant in vaccine decision-making, this study aimed to assess influenza vaccination hesitancy and anxiety levels in this population and to explore the association between women's characteristics, their reluctance, and anxiety levels.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

India's National COVID Vaccination Program recommended vaccination of children ages 6-12 years in April 2022. This study assessed vaccine acceptance among mothers to better understand potential barriers and facilitators of national acceptance of pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. Qualitative data were collected through three focus group discussions (FGDs) with mothers who had children younger than 12 years of age; FGD-1 was composed of mothers who worked at a tertiary medical center in India, whereas FGD-2 and FGD-3 were composed of mothers who sought care at urban and rural community health centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake in the French Caribbean has remained below 25% since introduction in 2007, which is well behind national and international targets. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), we explored parental preferences around HPV vaccination and optimized communication content in a sample of parents of middle-school pupils in Guadeloupe.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in public and private middle age schools in Guadeloupe in June 2023 using an online questionnaire.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Using an inferior decoy alternative to nudge COVID-19 vaccination.

Sci Rep

January 2025

NIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural and Social Sciences - Behavioural Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Scarman Rd, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Optimizing vaccine uptake is a public health challenge that requires the implementation of effective strategies. The asymmetric dominance (or decoy) effect describes the increasing likelihood of selecting an option when a clearly inferior alternative is offered. Therefore, we aimed to test the impact of offering decoy alternatives-less convenient vaccination appointments-on vaccination intentions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!