Previous studies revealed an S-R compatibility effect between physical stimulus size and response location, with faster left (right) responses to small (large) stimuli, respectively, as compared to the reverse assignments. Here, we investigated the locus of interactions between the processing of size and spatial locations. In Experiment 1, we explored whether stimulus size and stimulus location interact at a perceptual level of processing when responses lack spatiality. The stimuli varied on three feature dimensions (color, size, location), and participants responded vocally to each feature in a separate task. Most importantly, we failed to observe a size-location congruency effect in the color-naming task where S-R compatibility effects were excluded. In Experiment 2, responses to color were spatial, that is, key-presses with the left and right hand. With these responses there was a congruency effect. In addition, we tested the interaction of the size-location compatibility effect with the Simon effect, which is known to originate at the stage of response selection. We observed an interaction between the two effects only with a subsample of participants with slower reaction times (RTs) and a larger size-location compatibility effect in a control condition. Together, the results suggest that the size-location compatibility effect arises at the response selection stage. An extended leaky, competing accumulator model with independent staggered impacts of stimulus size and stimulus location on response selection fits the data of Experiment 2 and specifies how the size-location compatibility effect and the Simon effect can arise during response selection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-024-02979-3 | DOI Listing |
Atten Percept Psychophys
November 2024
Leibniz Research Center for Working Environment and Human Factors (IfADo), Dortmund, Germany.
Previous studies revealed an S-R compatibility effect between physical stimulus size and response location, with faster left (right) responses to small (large) stimuli, respectively, as compared to the reverse assignments. Here, we investigated the locus of interactions between the processing of size and spatial locations. In Experiment 1, we explored whether stimulus size and stimulus location interact at a perceptual level of processing when responses lack spatiality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
November 2024
Department of Psychology, TU Dortmund University, Emil-Figge-Straße 50, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.
The spatial-size association of response codes (SSARC) effect refers to the observation that left responses are faster and more accurate to small stimuli whereas right responses are faster and more accurate to large stimuli, as compared to the reverse assignment. The underlying spatial-size associations are strongly asymmetrical with physical size/location stimuli and vocal location/size responses and allow for regular but not reciprocal SSARC effects. Recent evidence, however, points towards an important role of stimulus mode in the emergence of reciprocal compatibility effects.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychol Res
October 2024
Department of Psychology, TU Dortmund University, Emil-Figge-Strasse 50, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.
The so-called spatial-size association of response codes (SSARC) effect denotes that humans respond faster and more accurately with a left response to physically small stimuli and a right response to physically large stimuli, as compared to the opposite mapping. According to an application of the CORE principle to the SSARC effect, the habit to grasp larger/heavier objects with one's dominant hand and smaller/lighter objects with one's non-dominant hand creates spatial-size associations. We investigated if grasping habits play a causal role in the formation of spatial-size associations by testing if the mapping of a preceding object-grasping task affects the size of the SSARC effect in subsequent choice-response tasks with keypress responses.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
September 2023
Department of Psychology, TU Dortmund University, Emil-Figge Straße 50, 44227, Dortmund, Germany.
The spatial-size association of response codes (SSARC) effect describes the phenomenon that left responses are faster and more accurate to small stimuli whereas right responses are faster and more accurate to large stimuli, as compared to the opposite mapping. The effect indicates associations between the mental representations of physical size and space. Importantly, the theoretical accounts of SSARC effects make different predictions about the reciprocity and/or symmetry of spatial-size associations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIndian J Gastroenterol
April 2023
Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology, South Ambazari Road, Nagpur, 440 010, India.
Background: Colonic polyps can be detected and resected during a colonoscopy before cancer development. However, about 1/4th of the polyps could be missed due to their small size, location or human errors. An artificial intelligence (AI) system can improve polyp detection and reduce colorectal cancer incidence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!