AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the hospitalization risks for perinatal conditions in children conceived through assisted reproductive technology (ART) versus naturally conceived children, with breakdowns by treatment type.
  • Conducted in the UK from 2002 to 2009, the research involved over 44,000 children born via ART and compared their hospital admissions to nearly 90,000 naturally conceived controls and their siblings.
  • Results showed that ART children had a higher risk of hospitalization for severe perinatal events compared to naturally conceived children, but no significant difference was found when comparing ART children to their naturally conceived siblings.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare the risk of hospitalisation for conditions originating in the perinatal period between children conceived via assisted reproductive technology and those that are naturally conceived, differentiating by treatment type.

Study Design, Setting And Participants: Population-based record-linkage study of children born after assisted reproduction in the UK between 2002 and 2009 (n=44 618), their naturally conceived siblings (n=8462) and matched naturally conceived population (n=89 072) controls linked to their hospital inpatient records up to 31 March 2016.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: Robust estimates of the overall and cause-specific risk of hospital admission for adverse perinatal events and the comparison of outcomes by type of treatment.

Results: Over the study period, 17 132 (38.40%) children conceived via assisted reproduction and 30 306 (34.02%) and 1738 (20.54%) naturally conceived population and sibling controls, respectively, were admitted to the hospital for severe perinatal events. Compared with the population controls, singletons (Risk ratio (95% CI 1.30 (1.26, 1.34))) and twins (1.01 (0.99, 1.03)) conceived via assisted reproduction exhibited a higher risk of hospitalisation for any adverse perinatal event. However, no such increase was observed in the within-sibling analysis (0.97 (0.84, 1.12)). Similar patterns were seen for diagnoses related to length of gestation and fetal growth (vs population controls: 1.37 (1.29, 1.46); vs siblings: 1.17 (0.86, 1.60)); birth trauma (vs population controls: 1.23 (1.04, 1.44); vs siblings: 0.78 (0.47, 1.30)); respiratory and cardiovascular disorders (vs population controls: 1.28 (1.20, 1.38); vs siblings: 0.72 (0.53, 0.98)); infections (vs population controls: 1.30 (1.06, 1.59); vs siblings: 0,68 (0.24, 1.90)) and several other conditions. Associations were similar when comparing in vitro fertilisation to intracytoplasmic sperm injection and were higher when comparing fresh to frozen embryo transfers.

Conclusion: Children conceived via assisted reproduction showed modest increases in the risk of hospitalisations for severe perinatal events when compared with population controls, although these findings were attenuated in the sibling analyses. The imprecision of within-sibling analyses highlights the need for larger studies to explore potential causal effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555099PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091910DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

population controls
24
conceived assisted
20
assisted reproduction
20
children conceived
16
naturally conceived
16
perinatal events
12
conceived
9
population-based record-linkage
8
record-linkage study
8
risk hospitalisation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!