Introduction: The functional deficits resulting from traumatic brachial plexus damage are substantial. In this study, we provide a clinical case with the successful restoration of elbow and shoulder function following a bipolar latissimus dorsi muscle transfer procedure.
Case Presentation: A male patient, aged 26, presented at the outpatient clinic with a primary concern of left upper limb weakness that had persisted for a duration of 1.5 years subsequent to an industrial incident. The patient's motor function was assessed as M0 for shoulder abduction and elbow flexion, indicating a range of motion of zero degrees for both movements. Additionally, the Mayo Elbow Score (MES) measurement was recorded as 60. Persistent tingling feelings were observed in the wrist and hand. The neurological assessment revealed a partial impairment of motor function in the radial, median, and ulnar nerves.
Clinical Discussion: The electromyographic assessment provided evidence and substantiated the diagnosis of an incomplete left brachial plexopathy. Prompt restoration of elbow flexion was observed on the initial day subsequent to the surgery, accompanied by a minor degree of shoulder abduction. At the six-month mark, the patient demonstrates the ability to execute a 100-degree flexion of the elbow and a 30-degree abduction of the shoulder, exhibiting motor strength at the M4 level.
Conclusion: Following a late brachial plexus injury, the utilization of a bipolar latissimus dorsi muscle flap has demonstrated an exceptional outcome in the context of elbow reconstruction. The preoperative evaluation of donor muscle strength will serve as a reliable indicator for predicting a favorable postoperative result.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600006 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.110554 | DOI Listing |
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A.
Purpose: To identify arthroscopic rotator cuff repair study groups and evaluate if study design or other study characteristics correlate with a repeat ipsilateral shoulder surgery.
Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted on March 20, 2021, and April 2, 2021. The following search terms were used by 2 different researchers: ((Rotator cuff repair[Title/Abstract]) AND (Revision[Title/Abstract]) NOT (Systematic Review[Title/Abstract]) NOT (arthroplasty[Title/Abstract]).
JBJS Essent Surg Tech
January 2025
Shoulder and Elbow Service, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, Florida.
Background: The incidence of revision shoulder arthroplasty continues to rise, and infection is a common indication for revision surgery. Treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in the shoulder remains a controversial topic, with the literature reporting varying methodologies, including the use of debridement and implant retention, single-stage and 2-stage surgeries, antibiotic spacers, and resection arthroplasty. Single-stage revision has been shown to have a low rate of recurrent infection, making it more favorable because it precludes the morbidity of a 2-stage operation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMicrosurgery
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background: Free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) for brachial plexus injury (BPI) requires adequate donor arterial flow for successful anastomosis. However, concomitant BPI and subclavian artery injury are not uncommon. Arteriovenous (AV) loop graft is one of the methods used to extend vessels to areas with vascular depletion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356500, Seattle, WA 98195-6500. Electronic address:
Background: Clinically important improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty is often assessed with shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) quantifying reduction in pain and restoration in function. It is unclear if commonly utilized threshold such as minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), represent optimal improvement from the patients' perspective. The objectives of this study were to utilize the Simple Shoulder Test to: 1) compare commonly utilized thresholds for change in score and final score to thresholds optimized to patient satisfaction using receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and 2) determine the impact of using different thresholds on reporting of independent predictors of successful outcome in terms of patient satisfaction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Shoulder Elbow Surg
January 2025
State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Division of Sports Medicine and Adult Reconstructive Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China; Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Nanjing Jiangsu, 210008, People's Republic of China. Electronic address:
Background: Arthroscopic repair is recommended for patients with bony Bankart lesions to restore anterior shoulder stability and avoid recurrent glenohumeral instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients following arthroscopic bony Bankart repair using a single suture anchor fixation technique named the "door-locking" technique.
Methods: From January 2017 to February 2024, a consecutive series of 22 patients with acute bony Bankart lesions underwent shoulder arthroscopy.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!