Introduction And Hypothesis: Despite the reputation of sacrocolpopexy as a highly durable reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, mesh-related complications remain a significant deterrent for patients. This review discusses the incidence, presentation, diagnosis, management and prevention of sacrocolpopexy mesh complications.
Methods: We reviewed the literature on sacrocolpopexy focusing on long-term mesh complications and their management. As the literature is not specifically robust, we also give our recommendations based on experience from a large-volume center. Intraoperative videos and images are provided to illustrate findings and management techniques.
Results: Sacrocolpopexy mesh complications include vaginal mesh exposure; bladder or bowel erosions; inflammatory and infectious conditions including spondylodiscitis; and mesh-related pain. Presentation ranges from overt symptoms such as mesh palpated in the vagina to insidious-like spondylodiscitis manifesting as back pain and malaise. Diagnosis relies on methodical history taking, review of operative reports, and a physical examination, with office-based endoscopy studies and imaging as indicated. Various management options have been described in the literature. We recommend an expectant approach for asymptomatic patients; For symptomatic vaginal exposure, we encourage removal of entire mesh arm(s) via an abdominal approach; however, many prefer to utilize a transvaginal or partial excisional approach first. Spondylodiscitis is managed with long-term antibiotics and often requires mesh removal. Prevention strategies include using a lightweight polypropylene mesh attached to well- vascularized vaginal walls, avoiding direct placement on any sutured vaginotomy or cystotomy. Delayed absorbable monofilament suture is non-inferior to permanent suture.
Conclusions: Sacrocolpopexy mesh complications can be challenging to diagnose and manage. Symptomatic cases often require a proactive approach; listening to patients when they describe persistent symptoms with postoperative onset; a low threshold for further evaluation; and upfront discussion of management options.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05955-5 | DOI Listing |
Urogynecology (Phila)
October 2024
Atrium Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC.
Importance: Limited data exist comparing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSCH) at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse.
Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare TLH versus LSCH at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse, hypothesizing that LSCH would demonstrate a higher proportion of recurrent prolapse, but a lower proportion of mesh exposures.
Study Design: This was a retrospective, secondary analysis comparing a prospective cohort of patients undergoing TLH sacrocolpopexy versus a retrospective cohort of patients who had undergone LSCH sacrocolpopexy.
Int Urogynecol J
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Introduction And Hypothesis: Autologous fascia lata has been increasingly utilised in pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries such as sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy. This case highlights sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata as a promising option for women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus and avoid synthetic mesh.
Methods: We report the case of a 65-year-old woman with stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse following one forceps and one spontaneous vaginal delivery.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China. Electronic address:
Objective: To compare the long-term efficacy of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with those of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Tertiary referral center in China.
J Robot Surg
December 2024
Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-9110, USA.
To assess the very long-term functional outcomes and complications of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) at our institution where this robotic technology for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair has been available since 2006. A retrospective review of a cohort of women who underwent a RASC was performed by an investigator not involved in the clinical care of these patients. Women with no electronic medical record follow-up in the last 2 years were contacted by telephone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt Urogynecol J
December 2024
Sydney Women's Endosurgery Centre (SWEC), St George Private Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Introduction And Hypothesis: Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a recognized treatment for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, mesh erosion remains a concern, particularly when performed with concomitant hysterectomy. This video presents data on one case of a modified technique aimed at potentially minimizing mesh erosion in robotic SCP.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!