Management of Sacrocolpopexy Mesh Complications-A Narrative Review and Clinical Experience from a Large-Volume Center.

Int Urogynecol J

Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Glickman Urologic Institute and Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Published: November 2024

Introduction And Hypothesis: Despite the reputation of sacrocolpopexy as a highly durable reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, mesh-related complications remain a significant deterrent for patients. This review discusses the incidence, presentation, diagnosis, management and prevention of sacrocolpopexy mesh complications.

Methods: We reviewed the literature on sacrocolpopexy focusing on long-term mesh complications and their management. As the literature is not specifically robust, we also give our recommendations based on experience from a large-volume center. Intraoperative videos and images are provided to illustrate findings and management techniques.

Results: Sacrocolpopexy mesh complications include vaginal mesh exposure; bladder or bowel erosions; inflammatory and infectious conditions including spondylodiscitis; and mesh-related pain. Presentation ranges from overt symptoms such as mesh palpated in the vagina to insidious-like spondylodiscitis manifesting as back pain and malaise. Diagnosis relies on methodical history taking, review of operative reports, and a physical examination, with office-based endoscopy studies and imaging as indicated. Various management options have been described in the literature. We recommend an expectant approach for asymptomatic patients; For symptomatic vaginal exposure, we encourage removal of entire mesh arm(s) via an abdominal approach; however, many prefer to utilize a transvaginal or partial excisional approach first. Spondylodiscitis is managed with long-term antibiotics and often requires mesh removal. Prevention strategies include using a lightweight polypropylene mesh attached to well- vascularized vaginal walls, avoiding direct placement on any sutured vaginotomy or cystotomy. Delayed absorbable monofilament suture is non-inferior to permanent suture.

Conclusions: Sacrocolpopexy mesh complications can be challenging to diagnose and manage. Symptomatic cases often require a proactive approach; listening to patients when they describe persistent symptoms with postoperative onset; a low threshold for further evaluation; and upfront discussion of management options.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05955-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sacrocolpopexy mesh
16
mesh complications
12
mesh
10
experience large-volume
8
large-volume center
8
management options
8
management
6
sacrocolpopexy
5
management sacrocolpopexy
4
mesh complications-a
4

Similar Publications

Importance: Limited data exist comparing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) versus laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSCH) at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare TLH versus LSCH at the time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse, hypothesizing that LSCH would demonstrate a higher proportion of recurrent prolapse, but a lower proportion of mesh exposures.

Study Design: This was a retrospective, secondary analysis comparing a prospective cohort of patients undergoing TLH sacrocolpopexy versus a retrospective cohort of patients who had undergone LSCH sacrocolpopexy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata.

Int Urogynecol J

December 2024

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.

Introduction And Hypothesis: Autologous fascia lata has been increasingly utilised in pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries such as sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy. This case highlights sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata as a promising option for women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus and avoid synthetic mesh.

Methods: We report the case of a 65-year-old woman with stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse following one forceps and one spontaneous vaginal delivery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To compare the long-term efficacy of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with those of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary referral center in China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To assess the very long-term functional outcomes and complications of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) at our institution where this robotic technology for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair has been available since 2006. A retrospective review of a cohort of women who underwent a RASC was performed by an investigator not involved in the clinical care of these patients. Women with no electronic medical record follow-up in the last 2 years were contacted by telephone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction And Hypothesis: Sacrocolpopexy (SCP) is a recognized treatment for apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP). However, mesh erosion remains a concern, particularly when performed with concomitant hysterectomy. This video presents data on one case of a modified technique aimed at potentially minimizing mesh erosion in robotic SCP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!