Fluid deresuscitation in critically ill children: comparing perspectives of intensivists and nephrologists.

Front Pediatr

Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Published: October 2024

Introduction: Fluid accumulation, presently defined as a pathologic state of overhydration/volume overload associated with clinical impact, is common and associated with worse outcomes. At times, deresuscitation, the active removal of fluid via diuretics or ultrafiltration, is necessary. There is no consensus regarding deresuscitation in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Little is known regarding perceptions and practices among pediatric intensivists and nephrologists regarding fluid provision and deresuscitation.

Methods: Cross-sectional electronic survey of pediatric nephrologists and intensivists from academic societies in the United States designed to better understand fluid management between disciplines. A clinical vignette was used to characterize the perceptions of optimal timing and method of deresuscitation initiation at four timepoints that correspond to different stages of shock.

Results: In total, 179 respondents (140 intensivists, 39 nephrologists) completed the survey. Most 75.4% (135/179) providers believe discussing fluid balance and initiating fluid deresuscitation in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients is "very important". The first clinical vignette time point (corresponding to resuscitation phase of early shock) had the most dissimilarity between intensivists and nephrologists ( = 0.01) with regards to initiation of deresuscitation. However, providers demonstrated increasing agreement in their responses to initiate deresuscitation as the clinical vignette progressed. Compared to intensivists, nephrologists were more likely to choose "dialysis or ultrafiltration" as a deresuscitation method during the optimization [10.3 vs. 2.9% ( = 0.07)], stabilization [18.0% vs. 3.6% ( < 0.01)], and evacuation [48.7% vs. 23.6% ( < 0.01)] phases of shock. Conversely, intensivists were more likely to utilize scheduled diuretics than nephrologists [47.1% vs. 28.2% ( = 0.04)] later on in the patient course.

Discussion: Most physicians believe that discussing fluid balance and deresuscitation is important. Nevertheless, when to initiate deresuscitation and how to accomplish it differed between nephrologist and intensivists. Widely understood and operationalizable definitions, further research, and eventually evidence-based guidelines are needed to help guide care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11551605PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1484893DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intensivists nephrologists
20
clinical vignette
12
fluid deresuscitation
8
pediatric intensive
8
intensive care
8
care unit
8
fluid
7
deresuscitation
7
intensivists
6
nephrologists
6

Similar Publications

Fluid deresuscitation in critically ill children: comparing perspectives of intensivists and nephrologists.

Front Pediatr

October 2024

Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Introduction: Fluid accumulation, presently defined as a pathologic state of overhydration/volume overload associated with clinical impact, is common and associated with worse outcomes. At times, deresuscitation, the active removal of fluid via diuretics or ultrafiltration, is necessary. There is no consensus regarding deresuscitation in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Acute kidney injury (AKI) significantly disrupts vital renal functions and is a common and serious condition in intensive care units (ICUs). AKI leads to extended hospital stays, increases mortality rates, and often necessitates nephrology consultations. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) plays a central role in managing AKI, requiring a multidisciplinary approach involving nephrologists, intensivists, and anesthesiologists.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Advances in critical care nephrology through artificial intelligence.

Curr Opin Crit Care

December 2024

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester.

Purpose Of Review: This review explores the transformative advancement, potential application, and impact of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML) and large language models (LLMs), on critical care nephrology.

Recent Findings: AI algorithms have demonstrated the ability to enhance early detection, improve risk prediction, personalize treatment strategies, and support clinical decision-making processes in acute kidney injury (AKI) management. ML models can predict AKI up to 24-48 h before changes in serum creatinine levels, and AI has the potential to identify AKI sub-phenotypes with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes for targeted interventions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: By controlling hypercapnia, respiratory acidosis, and associated consequences, extracorporeal CO removal (ECCOR) has the potential to facilitate ultra-protective lung ventilation (UPLV) strategies and to decrease injury from mechanical ventilation. We convened a meeting of European intensivists and nephrologists and used a modified Delphi process to provide updated insights into the role of ECCOR in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and to identify recommendations for a future randomized controlled trial.

Results: The group agreed that lung protective ventilation and UPLV should have distinct definitions, with UPLV primarily defined by a tidal volume (V) of 4-6 mL/kg predicted body weight with a driving pressure (ΔP) ≤ 14-15 cmHO.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Implementing Advance Care Planning (ACP) for patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) during hemodialysis faces challenges and shows inconsistencies across Europe despite legal support.
  • A multidisciplinary model was established in 2019, involving a team of specialists—including a nephrologist, psychologist, palliative care expert, and anesthesiologist/intensivist—to address the complex needs of patients.
  • The authors highlight the strengths of this collaborative model and propose guidelines to improve ACP practices within the nephrology field in Europe.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!