Machine learning prediction of the unconfined compressive strength of controlled low strength material using fly ash and pond ash.

Sci Rep

Research Unit in Data Science and Digital Transformation, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat School of Engineering, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study emphasizes the need to utilize industrial byproducts like coal ash in civil engineering to mitigate environmental pollution and waste.
  • It investigates the properties of controlled low-strength material (CLSM) made from coal ash, focusing on flowability and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) after 28 days.
  • Four machine learning models were tested to predict UCS, with the multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) model showing the best performance, providing better accuracy than traditional methods and highlighting key factors influencing CLSM effectiveness.

Article Abstract

The sustainable use of industrial byproducts in civil engineering is a global priority, especially in reducing the environmental impact of waste materials. Among these, coal ash from thermal power plants poses a significant challenge due to its high production volume and potential for environmental pollution. This study explores the use of controlled low-strength material (CLSM), a flowable fill made from coal ash, cement, aggregates, water, and admixtures, as a solution for large-scale coal ash utilization. CLSM is suitable for both structural and geotechnical applications, balancing waste management with resource conservation. This research focuses on two key CLSM properties: flowability and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) at 28 days. Traditional testing methods are resource-intensive, and empirical models often fail to accurately predict UCS due to complex nonlinear relationships among variables. To address these limitations, four machine learning models-minimax probability machine regression (MPMR), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), the group method of data handling (GMDH), and functional networks (FN) were employed to predict UCS. The MARS model performed best, achieving R values of 0.9642 in training and 0.9439 in testing, with the lowest comprehensive measure (COM) value of 1.296. Sensitivity analysis revealed that cement content was the most significant factor with obtaining R = 0.88, followed by water (R = 0.82), flowability (R = 0.79), pond ash (R = 0.78), curing period (R = 0.73), and fine content (R = 0.68), with fly ash (R = 0.55) having the least impact. These machine learning models provide superior accuracy compared to traditional methods, particularly in handling complex interactions between mix components. The proposed models offer a practical approach for predicting CLSM performance, supporting sustainable construction practices and the efficient use of industrial byproducts. The novelty of this study lies in the development of precise design equations for evaluating UCS, promoting both practical applicability and environmental sustainability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555076PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78050-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

machine learning
12
coal ash
12
unconfined compressive
8
compressive strength
8
fly ash
8
pond ash
8
industrial byproducts
8
predict ucs
8
ash
7
machine
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!