A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Certified peer recovery support specialists and substance use related emergency department visits: A mixed methods study of the patient experience. | LitMetric

Certified peer recovery support specialists and substance use related emergency department visits: A mixed methods study of the patient experience.

J Subst Use Addict Treat

Department of Health Behavior, Policy, and Administration Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia St. MC 0273, Reno, NV 89557, USA. Electronic address:

Published: November 2024

Introduction: Emergency department (ED) peer-delivered interventions have been implemented across the country to improve outcomes for people who use drugs. In this study we describe what elements patients believe led to a positive interaction with a certified peer recovery support specialist (CPRSS) in the ED and discuss implications when those elements were missing.

Methods: This is a qualitatively driven mixed methods study embedded within a larger longitudinal study. Using a close and open-ended question interview guide, we interviewed 26 participants from 2018 to 2023 who met with a CPRSS in a Nevada ED for a substance use related concern. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to code the transcripts and generate themes. Quantitative data (satisfaction, therapeutic alliance, and social support) were analyzed using student-t, Fisher's exact, and one-way ANOVA tests.

Results: Participants described numerous elements that they believed contributed to being satisfied with their CPRSS interaction, which we grouped into three categories: 1) how the CPRSS interaction felt, 2) how the CPRSS services were delivered, and 3) patient factors that influenced the interaction with a CPRSS. Elements that contributed to their satisfaction, including whether the CPRSS adapted to their current circumstances, if they received personalized referrals, and how their own mental and physical state impacted their receptivity to services.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight areas to optimize implementation and increase program uptake for future ED-based CPRSS-delivered interventions, including training CPRSS in the philosophy of harm reduction, following up with the patient post-ED, and tailoring services to the patients' immediate needs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209563DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

certified peer
8
peer recovery
8
recovery support
8
emergency department
8
mixed methods
8
methods study
8
cprss
8
cprss interaction
8
support specialists
4
specialists substance
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!