Background: Among patients with rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy, it is unclear whether early, postinduction restaging is associated with final tumor response. If so, interim restaging may alter rectal cancer decision-making.
Objective: To determine whether postinduction restaging with endoscopy and MRI is associated with final tumor response.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Settings: US tertiary care institution accredited by the National Accreditation Program for Rectal Cancer.
Patients: Patients with biopsy-proven rectal cancer who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy with interim (postinduction) restaging.
Main Outcome Measures: Association between response assessment on postinduction restaging and final treatment response.
Results: One hundred seven patients were analyzed. Patients with postinduction magnetic resonance tumor response grade 1 and 2 or complete endoscopic response were significantly more likely (OR 5.4, p < 0.01 and OR 3.7, p = 0.03, respectively) to ultimately achieve a final complete response. Likewise, the odds of a final incomplete response were significantly higher for patients with postinduction composite partial (OR 4.1, p < 0.01) or minimal (OR 12.0, p < 0.01) responses.
Limitations: Retrospective analysis and lack of detailed subclassification of partial endoscopic response may have limited the conclusions of these data. The limited sample size may also have biased these conclusions.
Conclusions: Tumor response to induction therapy is associated with the ultimate treatment response to total neoadjuvant therapy among complete or minimal responders; the significance of a partial interim response remains unclear. See Video Abstract .
Est Asociada La Reestadificacin Temprana Postinduccin Del Cancer De Recto Sometido A Terapia Neoadyuvante Total Con La Respuesta Teraputica Final: ANTECEDENTES:Entre los pacientes con cáncer de recto tratados con terapia neoadyuvante total, no está claro si la re-estadificación temprana posterior a la inducción está asociada con la respuesta tumoral final. De ser así, la re-estadificación provisoria podría alterar la toma de decisiones sobre el cáncer rectal.OBJETIVO:Determinar si la re-estadificación posterior a la inducción con endoscopia y resonancia magnética están asociadas con la respuesta tumoral final.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivoESCENARIO:Institución de atención terciaria de Estados Unidos, certificada por el Programa Nacional de Acreditación para el Cáncer de Recto.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer rectal confirmado por biopsia que fueron sometidos a terapia neoadyuvante total con re-estadificación provisoria (posterior a la inducción).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:La asociación entre la evaluación de la respuesta en la re-estadificación posterior a la inducción y la respuesta al final del tratamiento.RESULTADOS:Se estudiaron 107 pacientes. Aquellos que presentaban respuesta tumoral a la resonancia magnética post-inducción grado 1-2 o respuesta endoscópica completa tuvieron significativamente más probabilidades (OR (odds ratio) 5,4 [ p < 0,01] y OR: 3,7 [ p = 0,03], respectivamente) de lograr finalmente una respuesta completa final. Asimismo, las probabilidades de una respuesta incompleta final fueron significativamente mayores para los pacientes con respuestas parciales compuestas post-inducción (OR: 4,1, p < 0,01) o mínimas (OR: 12,0, p < 0,01).LIMITACIONES:El análisis retrospectivo y la falta de una subclasificación detallada de la respuesta endoscópica parcial pueden haber limitado las conclusiones de estos datos. El tamaño limitado de la muestra también puede haber sesgado las conclusiones mencionadas.CONCLUSIÓN:La respuesta tumoral a la terapia de inducción está asociada con la respuesta final al tratamiento con terapia neoadyuvante total entre los respondedores completos o mínimos; la importancia de una respuesta parcial provisional sigue sin estar clara. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003485 | DOI Listing |
Dis Colon Rectum
February 2025
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ann Thorac Surg
August 2022
Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address:
Background: Surgical management for potentially resectable stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is controversial. For some, persistent N2 disease after induction therapy is a contraindication to resection. We examined outcomes of a well-selected surgical cohort of postinduction IIIA-N2 NSCLC patients with persistent N2 disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
March 2021
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Würzburg University Hospital Medical Center, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Background: Preservation of kidney function in newly diagnosed (ND) multiple myeloma (MM) helps to prevent excess toxicity. Patients (pts) from two prospective trials were analyzed, provided postinduction (PInd) restaging was performed. Pts received three cycles with bortezomib (btz), cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (dex; VCD) or btz, lenalidomide (len), and dex (VRd) or len, adriamycin, and dex (RAD).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Transl Med
February 2018
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
There currently exists an area of controversy in treatment of esophageal cancer for patients who have an apparent clinical complete response (cCR) after induction chemoradiation. A standard treatment is to offer these patients an esophagectomy, but increasingly there is interest from both the patient and provider for active surveillance with so-called "salvage" esophagectomies for local recurrence as an alternative treatment paradigm. In this article, we review the existing evidence that stakeholders should consider for clinical decision-making in this specific patient population, including: the accuracy of post-induction clinical restaging, the reliability of operative risk assessment, the feasibility and adherence to surveillance strategies, and the observed outcomes in these patients after salvage esophagectomy or continued active surveillance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFActa Chir Belg
February 2008
Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
With the introduction of combined modality therapy and better staging techniques, the role of surgical resection for non-small cell lung cancer is continuously redefined. The final aim of surgical treatment for lung cancer is complete resection, also after neoadjuvant or induction therapy. Precise criteria for complete resection have recently been defined.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!