A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Integrating transcriptomic data and digital pathology for NRG-based prediction of prognosis and therapy response in gastric cancer. | LitMetric

Background: Cancer is characterized by its ability to resist cell death, and emerging evidence suggests a potential correlation between non-apoptotic regulated cell death (RCD), tumor progression, and therapy response. However, the prognostic significance of non-apoptotic RCD-related genes (NRGs) and their relationships with immune response in gastric cancer (GC) remain unclear.

Methods: In this study, RNA-seq gene expression and clinical information of GC patients were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas and the Gene Expression Omnibus databases. Cox and LASSO regression analyses were used to construct the NRG signature. Moreover, we developed a deep learning model based on ResNet50 to predict the NRG signature from digital pathology slides. The expression of signature hub genes was validated using real-time quantitative PCR and single-cell RNA sequencing data.

Results: We identified 13 NRGs as signature genes for predicting the prognosis of patients with GC. The high-risk group, characterized by higher NRG scores, demonstrated a shorter overall survival rate, increased immunosuppressive cell infiltration, and immune dysfunction. Moreover, associations were observed between the NRG signature and chemotherapeutic drug responsiveness, as well as immunotherapy effectiveness in GC patients. Furthermore, the deep learning model effectively stratified GC patients based on the NRG signature by leveraging morphological variances, showing promising results for the classification of GC patients. Validation experiments demonstrated that the expression level of SERPINE1 was significantly upregulated in GC, while the expression levels of GPX3 and APOD were significantly downregulated.

Conclusion: The NRG signature and its deep learning model have significant clinical implications, highlighting the importance of individualized treatment strategies based on GC subtyping. These findings provide valuable insights for guiding clinical decision-making and treatment approaches for GC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556273PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2024.2426758DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nrg signature
20
deep learning
12
learning model
12
digital pathology
8
therapy response
8
response gastric
8
gastric cancer
8
cell death
8
gene expression
8
signature
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!