AI Article Synopsis

  • - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred method for treating benign gallbladder disease, but there are risks like bile duct injuries (BDIs) that need to be minimized using identification techniques such as the "Critical View of Safety" (CVS) and the infundibular technique (IT).
  • - A systematic review assessed the outcomes of both techniques, analyzing 13 studies with a total of 4,837 patients, focusing on the incidence of BDIs, operative times, conversion rates, and length of hospital stays.
  • - The results showed that the CVS approach significantly reduced both overall and major BDIs compared to IT, but no other significant differences were observed between the two methods,

Article Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains the gold standard procedure for the management of benign gallbladder disease. Recognizing the need to mitigate complications, mainly bile duct injury (BDI), various techniques for ductal identification during LC have emerged, including the "Critical View of Safety" (CVS) and the infundibular technique (IT). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess and compare the outcomes of both techniques, with a primary focus on evaluating their impact on BDIs. A comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases. The search focused on the surgical technique, incidences of minor and major BDIs, operative time, conversion rate, and length of stay, among patients undergoing LC for benign gallbladder disease. Our initial search retrieved 264 studies. After screening the unique studies against our predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, only five met our criteria and were included. Additionally, a manual search identified eight more relevant studies, bringing the total number of included studies to 13. The total number of included patients was 4,837. Approximately two-thirds underwent LC using the CVS approach (61.1%), and 66.3% were female, with a mean age of 44.4 ± 11.2 years. The CVS approach was associated with a significant reduction in overall BDIs (RR = 0.36; 95% CI 0.18-0.71) and major BDIs (RR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.13-0.63). However, there were no significant differences in terms of minor BDIs, operative time, conversion rates, or length of stay. Our study demonstrated the superiority of the CVS approach in terms of reducing the incidence of overall and major BDIs compared to IT. However, our study revealed no other significant differences between the two techniques. Further research, including multicentric randomized controlled trials, will be necessary to further evaluate the efficacy of these techniques.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02029-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

major bdis
12
cvs approach
12
infundibular technique
8
laparoscopic cholecystectomy
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
benign gallbladder
8
gallbladder disease
8
bdis operative
8
operative time
8

Similar Publications

Selective vs Routine Cholangiography Across a Health Care Enterprise.

JAMA Surg

December 2024

Quality Improvement & Patient Safety, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Importance: There is sparse literature on whether routine cholangiography (RC) vs selective cholangiography (SC) during cholecystectomy is associated with improved perioperative outcomes, regardless of whether an intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) is performed.

Objective: To compare perioperative outcomes of cholecystectomy between surgeons who routinely vs selectively perform IOC.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2015 through June 2023 and took place within the Cleveland Clinic Enterprise, which includes 18 hospitals and 9 ambulatory surgery centers in 2 states (Ohio and Florida).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are dreaded complications of one of the most common general surgical procedures. The injury impacts the quality of life and may have several long-term complications. In some cases, it can also lead to mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the preferred method for treating benign gallbladder disease, but there are risks like bile duct injuries (BDIs) that need to be minimized using identification techniques such as the "Critical View of Safety" (CVS) and the infundibular technique (IT).
  • - A systematic review assessed the outcomes of both techniques, analyzing 13 studies with a total of 4,837 patients, focusing on the incidence of BDIs, operative times, conversion rates, and length of hospital stays.
  • - The results showed that the CVS approach significantly reduced both overall and major BDIs compared to IT, but no other significant differences were observed between the two methods,
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Iatrogenic bile duct injuries (BDIs) prevention during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) relies on meticulous anatomical dissections through direct visualization. Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) with indocyanine green (ICG) improves the visualization of extrahepatic biliary structures. Although ICG can be administered either intravenously or intragallbladder, there remains uncertainty regarding the optimal method for different patient populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are significant complications that can occur after gallbladder removal surgery (cholecystectomy), often requiring surgical repair for the resulting strictures.
  • * A study involving 68 patients revealed that most sought treatment within a month of surgery, with common symptoms including jaundice and peritonitis; successful long-term outcomes were noted in 90% of cases, despite some complications.
  • * Early detection and referral to specialized care are crucial for effective treatment and improving the chances of favorable long-term results in patients with post-cholecystectomy biliary strictures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!