Objective: To evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes.

Methods: After searching different databases, we retrieved and included randomized controlled trials on long-term supplementation of vitamin D (≥1-year intervention) and reporting cardiovascular outcomes. We calculated risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes.

Results: Compared to the control group, the vitamin D group was not associated with a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) [risk ratio=0.99; 95% CI: 0.94-1.03]. We found no difference between the vitamin D group and the control group for the outcomes of incidences of myocardial infarction, heart failure, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality. The heterogeneity was low for all outcomes.

Conclusion: According to our meta-analysis, vitamin D supplementation did not reduce major adverse cardiovascular events, other cardiovascular parameters, and all-cause mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543226PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000002458DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vitamin supplementation
12
supplementation cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular outcomes
8
control group
8
vitamin group
8
major adverse
8
adverse cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular events
8
all-cause mortality
8
cardiovascular
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!