A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 143

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 994
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3134
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Value of Life and Reproductive and Professional Autonomy. | LitMetric

The Value of Life and Reproductive and Professional Autonomy.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics

Professor of Bioethics and Health Research, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Published: November 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The article examines John Harris' focus on reproductive autonomy and its importance for promoting liberal perspectives on reproductive and genetic technologies.
  • Harris argues that reproductive autonomy is vital and needs strong justifications for any limitations placed upon it, particularly concerning prospective parents seeking to use reproductive technologies.
  • The discussion expands to include medical professionals in the reproductive field, questioning the ethical justification of existing restrictions on both patients and clinicians imposed by regulators and professional guidelines.

Article Abstract

This article considers John Harris' work on autonomy, specifically reproductive autonomy, outlined in and developed throughout his career. Harris often used the concept of reproductive autonomy to make the case for liberal approaches to developments in reproductive and genetic technologies. Harris argued that reproductive autonomy should be highly valued, and therefore we need compelling arguments to justify limiting it in anyway. When discussing reproductive autonomy, Harris focused mainly on restrictions on the potential users of reproductive technologies autonomy, that is, prospective parents. This article extends the discussion of autonomy and the appropriate limits to individuals exercising their autonomy to medical professionals working in this area. Given reproductive technologies have become part of routine medical practice, this article considers whether the current restrictions on both patients and clinicians, as imposed by regulators and professional guidelines, remain ethically justified.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0963180124000537DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reproductive autonomy
16
autonomy
9
article considers
8
reproductive technologies
8
reproductive
7
life reproductive
4
reproductive professional
4
professional autonomy
4
autonomy article
4
considers john
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: fwrite(): Write of 34 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 272

Backtrace:

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_write_close(): Failed to write session data using user defined save handler. (session.save_path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Unknown

Line Number: 0

Backtrace: