Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Biocompatible computer-assisted design (CAD) implants for cranioplasty are associated with high costs and considerable waiting time. We present the results of the first cranioplasty experience in our country using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with customized 3D molds of the cranial defect.
Methods: We present a case series describing five patients with extensive cranial defects who underwent cranioplasty with PMMA using customized 3D molds. From tomographic studies, a bone implant model for the cranial defect was virtually designed and a mold was built according to the specifications of the defect. The mold was printed in 3D using acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene. With the sterile mold, the implant could be designed intraoperatively with PMMA to perform the cranioplasty. The evolution, complications, and cost of the implant were evaluated.
Results: No postoperative complications were observed. Good aesthetic and functional results were achieved in all patients. The cost of the implant per patient using our technique was approximately $350 USD. In our country, the cost of CAD implants varies between $10000 and $20000 USD.
Conclusions: Cranioplasty with PMMA and 3D custom mold is a safe and low-cost technique that would benefit patients in middle- and low-income countries. Compared to CAD implants, the cost was reduced by 95%-97%. This technique can be implemented on a large scale with remarkable benefits in low- and middle-income countries.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.139 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!