AI Article Synopsis

  • Clinicians and policymakers are looking to collaborate with faith-affiliated treatment centers (FATCs) to improve access to effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD), but there's limited knowledge about how these centers compare to non-faith-based ones in offering evidence-based services.
  • An analysis using the 2021 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey found that FATCs generally provide fewer medication options for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and are less inclined to accept clients using MOUD, while they tend to offer more residential treatment and transitional housing.
  • The study highlights the need for further research to understand the reasons behind these differences and emphasizes the importance of aligning the goals of clinicians and policymakers with the values of FATCs when forming

Article Abstract

Introduction: Amidst an ongoing surge of opioid use disorder (OUD) incidence, clinicians and policymakers are seeking partnerships with faith communities - including with faith-affiliated treatment centers (FATCs) - to expand access to evidence-based OUD treatment. However, little is known whether FATCs differentially offer such evidence-based treatment services, particularly medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and co-occurring mental health care.

Methods: We use the 2021 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey (N-SUMHSS) to examine differences in provision of several OUD services, including MOUD, psychological treatments, mental health services, medical services, recovery support services, and services related to treatment accessibility, between self-identified FATCs and non-FATCs. We also explored differences in characteristics related to insurance, licensure, and accreditation.

Results: FATCs were less likely than non-FATCs to offer almost all measure of MOUD and more likely to refuse to accept clients who use MOUD. They were also less likely to report using telemedicine. However, they were more likely to offer residential treatment, Twelve Step facilitation, and transitional housing. We find little evidence that FATCs offer co-occurring mental health treatments at different rates than non-FATCs.

Conclusion: More research is needed to examine the factors that drive these differences, especially in MOUD and transitional housing. When partnering with FATCs, clinicians and policymakers should seek common ground with FATCs and recognize the philosophies, values, and concerns that may potentially be driving these differences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2024.209572DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mental health
16
opioid disorder
12
medications opioid
8
faith-affiliated treatment
8
treatment centers
8
clinicians policymakers
8
co-occurring mental
8
health services
8
fatcs non-fatcs
8
transitional housing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!