A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Safety Analysis of Co-Administration of Radiation Therapy with Enfortumab Vedotin Based Regimens in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab (P) are standard treatments for advanced urothelial carcinoma, and this study investigates the safety of combining EV with radiation therapy (RT).
  • The study involved nine patients who received EV and RT simultaneously, focusing on the side effects of radiation and symptom relief.
  • Results showed that adverse effects were mostly mild, with significant symptom relief achieved; further research is suggested for broader conclusions.

Article Abstract

Introduction/background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab (P) is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). Because radiation (RT) is frequently used for symptom palliation, we examined the safety of co-administering EV with RT.

Materials And Methods: This single institution retrospective study selected patients with la/mUC, who received at least 1 dose of EV and initiated RT to any site within 30 days of each other. Patient characteristics, number of EV cycles received, the location of irradiated sites, RT dose/delivery approach, severity/type of radiation treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and symptom response after RT were recorded. The primary aim of this study was to examine radiation TRAEs, with severity graded using the CTCAE version 5.0 classification.

Results: Nine patients with 15 irradiated metastasis met eligibility criteria. The median radiation dose and cycles of EV were 30 Gy and 5 cycles respectively. Patients only experienced acute grade 1 or 2 TRAEs including fatigue, nausea, and dermatitis without desquamation. Chronic treatment-related toxicity was noted in 2 patients, which were grade 1 neck pain and 2 fatigue. All patients demonstrated some degree of symptom relief and four experienced complete resolution of their cancer-related symptoms at the irradiated site. One patient with limited disease burden completed stereotactic body radiation therapy and remains disease free 6 months after discontinuing all treatment.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that co-administration of RT with EV-based regimens could be safe and effective for symptom palliation. Larger series examining this treatment combination are needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102243DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiation therapy
8
enfortumab vedotin
8
metastatic urothelial
8
urothelial carcinoma
8
symptom palliation
8
radiation
6
patients
6
safety analysis
4
analysis co-administration
4
co-administration radiation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!