A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A New Combined Urogynecology and Colorectal Surgery Pelvic Floor Clinic-1 Year On. | LitMetric

Introduction And Hypothesis: This study is aimed at characterizing patients seen at a new combined pelvic floor clinic (CPFC) established at a tertiary women's hospital in Singapore. Study goals include identifying patterns of symptom clusters and reviewing management strategies compared with international care standards, improving understanding of complex female pelvic floor dysfunction, and guiding future development of clinical and ancillary support.

Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of medical case record review for all patients seen at the CPFC between 1 September 2020 and 31 August 2021. All patients seen at CPFC during this study period were included for analysis. Data were deidentified and aggregated, with analysis performed for descriptive and summary statistics. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained with waiver of informed consent.

Results: Sixty-six referrals were made to the CPFC, with 57 patients seen in 11 clinic sessions across the 12-month period. The most common reasons for referral were fecal or flatus incontinence (30, 52.6%), severe constipation or defecatory dysfunction (21.1%), and rectal prolapse (17.5%). Most patients (78.9%) had multiple symptoms.

Conclusions: Our patient demographic profile aligns with known risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction, presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms-similar to PFCs worldwide. The new workflow and services were well positioned to address patients' needs, including those left previously untreated, or received uncoordinated care. Conservative approaches were first employed, like with other global PFCs. The combined multidisciplinary model of care resulted in good outcomes for patients managed both conservatively and surgically. Future studies to analyze patient satisfaction are planned.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05968-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pelvic floor
16
floor dysfunction
8
patients cpfc
8
patients
6
combined urogynecology
4
urogynecology colorectal
4
colorectal surgery
4
pelvic
4
surgery pelvic
4
floor
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!