Background: The identification of reliable prognostic biomarkers is crucial for optimizing cancer treatment strategies, especially in the era of personalized medicine. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in various cancer types, with a focus on its association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published up to 28 July 2024. We performed the meta-analyses with the generic inverse variance method with a random effects model and reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: The comprehensive literature search identified 10 studies comprising 2351 patients. Pooled analyses demonstrated that elevated pretreatment NER levels were significantly correlated with poorer OS (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.28-2.36, < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.21-1.95, < 0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed a consistent adverse association between high NER and OS across various tumor types and geographic locations, although results from studies conducted in the Far East did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that elevated NER is associated with poorer OS and PFS in cancer patients, suggesting its potential utility as a non-invasive prognostic marker. Further validation in large, prospective studies is warranted to establish NER's role in guiding personalized treatment strategies across diverse oncologic contexts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545344PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16213689DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio
8
ratio ner
8
ner cancer
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
treatment strategies
8
literature search
8
ner
5
prognostic
4
prognostic neutrophil-to-eosinophil
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Advanced penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis and an unmet need for biomarkers. We performed a retrospective evaluation of real-world efficacy, safety outcomes, and baseline inflammatory biomarkers in patients with advanced pSCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients with advanced pSCC who received ICIs from 2012 to 2023 at the Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University in Atlanta, GA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The identification of reliable prognostic biomarkers is crucial for optimizing cancer treatment strategies, especially in the era of personalized medicine. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in various cancer types, with a focus on its association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies published up to 28 July 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis (ICI myocarditis) is an infrequent but potentially fatal immune-related adverse event. This study aimed to identify valuable indicators for risk prediction and evaluation of disease severity and outcomes.

Methods: A total of 79 patients with severe or mild ICI myocarditis and 158 controls without post-ICI immune-related adverse events were enrolled in this retrospective study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Purpose: This study aims to evaluate neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) as a prognostic and/or predictive biomarker in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) treated with nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab.

Patients/materials And Methods: We performed a retrospective study on m-ccRCC patients treated with nivolumab or ipilimumab/nivolumab (2012-2022). Baseline NER was calculated and correlated with clinical outcomes: response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio Predicts the Efficacy of Avelumab in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Enrolled in the MALVA Study (Meet-URO 25).

Clin Genitourin Cancer

August 2024

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Careggi University Hospital, Clinical Oncology, Florence, Italy.

Background: Neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) has been described to be associated with outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in several tumor types, but less is known about its role of in the response to avelumab in advanced urothelial cancer (aUC). Thus, we reported outcomes by NER of aUC patients treated with avelumab as maintenance after initial response to platinum-based chemotherapy and enrolled in the Maintenance with AVeLumAb ([MALVA] in advanced urothelial neoplasms in response to first-line chemotherapy: an observational retrospective study) study (Meet-URO 25).

Patients And Methods: Median NER at baseline and after 3 cycles of avelumab were calculated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!