AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study evaluates the electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold (eSRT) to create auditory maps for people using pulse-width-modulation cochlear implants, focusing on how single vs. multiple electrode stimulations affect detection rates and comfort loudness (C-levels).
  • - Researchers measured eSRT in 19 ears using 1, 3, and 5 electrodes across different cochlear regions, finding higher detection rates for multielectrode stimulation and better performance in apical and basal areas compared to the middle region.
  • - The results suggest that multielectrode stimulation improves eSRT detection rates and offers slightly better correlations with C-levels, indicating that eSRTs from pulse-width modulation implants

Article Abstract

Objective: This study assesses the electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold (eSRT) as an objective method for generating auditory maps in individuals with pulse-width-modulation cochlear implants (CIs). It investigates the impact of both single- and multiple-electrode stimulations on eSRT detection rates and their association with patients' comfort loudness levels (C-levels). Despite eSRT exploration by several CI brands incorporating pulse-amplitude-modulation stimulation technology, there is a lack of information on systems using pulse-width modulation.

Approach: The eSRT was measured in 19 ears ipsilaterally and contralaterally in response to stimulations in groups of 1, 3, and 5 electrodes across five distinct cochlear regions, spanning from apical to basal. For each group, the eSRT detection rate and its correlation with the C-levels were analyzed both regionally and overall.

Main Results: In both contralateral and ipsilateral sides, higher electrically evoked stapedius reflex (eSR) detection rates were obtained for multielectrode (67%, 47%) than for single-electrode (41%, 23%) stimulation. Invoking eSR in the apical and basal regions was easier than in the middle region. The multiple stimulation just increased slightly the correlation coefficients between eSRT and C-levels from 0.73 to 0.77 and from 0.77 to 0.85 (p < 0.05) for the contralateral and ipsilateral ears, respectively.

Significance: Our research indicates that using a multielectrode stimulation approach enhances the detection rate of eSRT and slightly improves the correlation coefficient between eSRT and C-levels. It is found preferable to obtain measurements from the contralateral side due to its higher detection rate, although the ipsilateral side yields a marginally higher correlation coefficient. The findings suggest that eSRTs obtained from pulse width modulation implants could aid audiologists in programming the device.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004354DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electrically evoked
12
evoked stapedius
12
stapedius reflex
12
detection rate
12
esrt
9
reflex threshold
8
threshold esrt
8
pulse width
8
width modulation
8
cochlear implants
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!